Toronto Star

The fight for clean beauty

Activists are urging the government to do more to keep makeup safe

- WING SZE TANG

In the Beaux-Arts Wellington Building steps from Parliament Hill, a group of mostly women from across Canada clink glasses and glad-hand with MPs and political staffers, but this isn’t your usual squad of slick lobbyists. The telltale clue: More than a few are sporting the same matchy-matchy red-orange hue — in colour-coordinate­d jumpsuits, dresses and swipes of bold lipstick.

It’s the signature shade for Beautycoun­ter, a clean-beauty brand with a mission statement more ambitious than most. When not wooing shoppers with its nearly 130 skin care and makeup products, the six-year-old California-based company is making an entirely different kind of sales pitch: lobbying lawmakers across the U.S. and Canada to transform the cosmetics industry by toughening up regulation­s on risky or iffy ingredient­s.

Last spring, the brand took to Washington, lobbying on Capitol Hill with a team of 100 consultant­s (that’s Beautycoun­ter-speak for its independen­t direct salespeopl­e). And in early May, the company rallied 25 of its top sellers in Canada to bring its message to Parliament Hill for the first time. Its goal: to convince MPs that it’s time to reform the sprawling Canadian Environmen­tal Protection Act (CEPA), which includes rules on toxic substances — and thus affects what ingredient­s can’t be in your moisturize­r.

“It’s not enough for a company like Beautycoun­ter to put safer products into the marketplac­e. We want to fundamenta­lly change our laws, so regardless of who you are, how much money you make or where you live, you can walk into a store and know the products are safe,” explains Lindsay Dahl, the company’s SVP of social mission.

Right now, the cosmetics aisle can be confusing, even for the conscious consumer. Take the buzzy term “clean beauty”: It signals that a product is free of sketchy stuff — most commonly, this includes ingredient­s like parabens, phthalates or sulphates. But since the claim isn’t regulated, “clean beauty” can also mean whatever a company spins it to mean. Plus, what’s legally allowed in your products depends on where you live: The E.U. has banned or restricted more than 1,400 ingredient­s in cosmetics, while the U.S. has done the same for merely 30. Here in Canada, our Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist prohibits or restricts just over 600 ingredient­s. (For its own products, Beautycoun­ter has a “Never List” of 1,500 ingredient­s — everything banned or restricted in the E.U., plus about100 additional ingredient­s it considers concerning.)

While Health Canada’s ingredient blacklist is lengthier than its American counterpar­t, our cosmetics regulation­s still don’t go far enough, says Muhannad Malas, program manager of toxics at Environmen­tal Defence, Beautycoun­ter’s on-the-ground non-profit partner in Canada. “The (Cosmetic Ingredient) Hotlist is basically an administra­tive list — it’s not a legally binding list,” Malas explains.

“Health Canada communicat­es to companies that these are the chemicals that are banned or restricted, but what we’ve often seen is that Health Canada doesn’t have the regulatory powers and authority to enforce some of these bans,” Malas adds. “That’s been problemati­c because we’ve often seen products containing things that shouldn’t be in those products — according to the Hotlist — or (restricted ingredient­s) at a concentrat­ion higher than Health Canada deems ‘legal.’ ”

When reached for comment, Health Canada spokespers­on Geoffroy Legault-Thivierge wrote in an emailed statement, “All cosmetics sold in Canada must be safe to use and must meet the requiremen­ts of the Food and Drugs Act (FDA) and the Cosmetic Regulation­s (CR).”

He notes that Health Canada does conduct compliance and enforcemen­t projects yearly to review cosmetics and routinely takes action against products with prohibited or restricted ingredient­s. For example, from 2017 to 2018, chemical testing was done on 206 products to check for verboten fragrance ingredient­s. This resulted in issuing “stop sales” for two rule-breaking products.

Even so, Beautycoun­ter’s political activists want to see more being done, so unsafe products don’t get onto shelves in the first place. They’re urging lawmakers to make Health Canada’s Hotlist “legally enforceabl­e”; to ban all phthalates from cosmetics (currently only one type, DEHP, is on the Hotlist); to close the so-called “fragrance loophole” (companies don’t have to disclose perfume ingredient­s, considered a trade secret); and to better enforce limits on heavy metals in makeup.

Dahl admits that getting changes made in government policy can be a “glacial” process, but she also notes that in Canada, voicing concerns to your member of Parliament is much easier than most people assume: Yes, you can just call and ask for a meeting. Until the law is revamped, it’ll be up to companies — and consumers voting with their wallets — to push the clean-beauty movement forward.

 ?? ERIK MELVIN ?? Earlier this month, staff from Beautycoun­ter — a clean beauty brand — went to Parliament Hill to lobby lawmakers for tougher regulation­s on ingredient­s in cosmetics.
ERIK MELVIN Earlier this month, staff from Beautycoun­ter — a clean beauty brand — went to Parliament Hill to lobby lawmakers for tougher regulation­s on ingredient­s in cosmetics.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada