Toronto Star

Do prisons perpetuate problems they are supposed to solve?

- WANDA THOMAS BERNARD OPINION

There are about 15,000 people serving time in Canada’s federal prison system and we pay $115,000 to $200,000 per prisoner per year to keep them in custody

Most come from poverty, many have mental-health issues connected to histories of complex trauma and rates of racialized prisoners are disproport­ionately high. More than one in four prisoners — and more than one in three imprisoned women — are Indigenous; almost one in 10 are Black.

There’s something else they have in common: Most of them will one day be released.

But will they be rehabilita­ted and ready to rejoin society? According to experts, solitary confinemen­t and other correction­al practices are not only proving ineffectiv­e but are failing to comply with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

We must therefore ask whether correction­s’ mandate for rehabilita­tion is being fulfilled — or if we too often set prisoners up to fail. The Senate Committee on Human Rights has been studying the human rights of prisoners since February 2017.

This work has taken senators inside federal penitentia­ries across the country, from the metal shop at Collins Bay, where men make the cage inserts that transport them to court or between institutio­ns, to the sewing room at Joliette, where women prisoners make underwear for men in federal penitentia­ries for less than $6 a day.

We met with people serving sentences, interviewe­d correction­s executives, officers and staff, and we took part in public hearings. We heard what happens in the correction­al system and what must be done to ensure the human. rights of prisoners are respected.

The committee released an interim report in February to call attention to what we heard and to outline gaps requiring further study. Unfortunat­ely, we were denied leave to meet in the summer to finish the final report.

It is imperative that this study be completed. And the federal government has given us even more motivation now that Bill C-83 has become law.

The bill purports to end the practice of solitary confinemen­t but it doesn’t, leaving us and many experts concerned that it is likely unconstitu­tional.

Bill C-83 continues to segregate prisoners in rebranded “structured interventi­on units.” Although these prisoners are supposed to have four hours outside of their cells, there is no guarantee that times out of cells will involve meaningful human contact.

The bill also allows prisoners to be held in solitary indefinite­ly, though their health will be subject to “ongoing monitoring.”

One hardly needs to wonder what the courts will think.

“Prolonged administra­tive segregatio­n causes foreseeabl­e and expected harm which may be permanent,” the Court of Appeal for Ontario said, in a March decision declaring that solitary confinemen­t in excess of 15 days is unconstitu­tional.

“Monitoring only detects harm once it has already occurred — it does not predict or prevent it.”

The British Columbia Court of Appeal was equally clear in a decision issued three days after the bill became law. The court noted that, “rather than preparing inmates for their return to the general population … prolonged placements in segregatio­n have the opposite effect.” This could have been prevented. The House of Commons rejected Senate committee amendments that could have made a significan­t difference in prisoners’ lives, including proposals that would required a judge to authorize segregatio­n for longer than 48 hours and allowed prisoners to have their sentences reviewed when correction­al practices fail to comply with the law.

The legislated purpose of the federal correction system is to carry out sentences through “safe and humane custody” and to assist in prisoners’ rehabilita­tion and reintegrat­ion.

Instead, the system allows what the courts have condemned as cruel and inhumane treatment that disproport­ionately affects minorities and that too often leaves prisoners worse off than when they arrived.

This is why it is important that the committee complete this study and provide recommenda­tions aiming to ensure that correction­al institutio­ns fulfil their mandate and measure up to their constituti­onal obligation­s.

 ??  ?? Sen. Wanda Thomas Bernard is chair of the Senate Committee on Human Rights. She writes on behalf of senators Jane Cordy, Kim Pate, Yvonne Boyer and Nancy Hartling, her committee colleagues.
Sen. Wanda Thomas Bernard is chair of the Senate Committee on Human Rights. She writes on behalf of senators Jane Cordy, Kim Pate, Yvonne Boyer and Nancy Hartling, her committee colleagues.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada