Toronto Star

An Ontario Constituti­on offers new hope for Ford

- RICHARD ALBERT CONTRIBUTO­R

In just over one year as Ontario Premier Doug Ford has already left a trail of cuts that would make Edward Scissorhan­ds proud.

He slashed spending in health care and education, cancelled the basic income pilot program, chopped Toronto City Council in half, and the carbon tax will be gone if he wins his day in court.

This small sampling in a long list of cuts leaves no doubt about what Ford is against. But what is he for? No one seems to know, perhaps not even Ford.

With polls showing declining support for the premier and his party, Ford must do something big to turn the page on his massive cuts, to awaken his party from its summer slumber, and to rally Ontarians behind a bold new idea.

He can start by finding a way to translate his successful 2018 election campaign slogan “government for the people” into workable public policies. He has gestured down this path, pledging to invoke the notwithsta­nding clause to increase the power of the people’s elected representa­tives. But he must go further if he wants to make good on his campaign promise.

Ford should propose to create a written constituti­on for Ontario. It would reinvigora­te his party, strengthen the federalist foundation­s of the country, and it would give Ontarians a memorable and meaningful experience in participat­ory democracy.

Like all other provinces and territorie­s, Ontario has a constituti­on, but it is not written down into a single document. Our constituti­on is instead an uncodified body of federal and provincial rules, political practices, unwritten norms, and judicial rulings.

Codifying a constituti­on for Ontario would have minimal legal effect, but it would have immense political returns. In our federation, Ontario’s constituti­on could not trump Canada’s, nor could it indefinite­ly disapply any part of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Yet inviting Ontarians to give themselves their own constituti­on would allow Ford to launch an extraordin­ary exercise of popular mobilizati­on that would signal to the people that he values their voice and that he wants to involve them directly in setting the course for the future of our province.

The process would involve debate and deliberati­on across the province in townhalls, public meetings and roving committee sessions. The people would come together to discuss what Ontario means to them, what our values are, and how these views should be expressed in our new constituti­on. The key feature of our new constituti­on would be its preamble, often where the most fundamenta­l principles of self-definition and selfgovern­ment are highlighte­d for all to celebrate.

Ford would make Ontario a trailblaze­r in Canada — the first province with its own codified constituti­on. It might also encourage Alberta, Quebec and others to follow suit, as a way of expressing the province’s distinct values within a larger, stronger, and united Canada.

Engaging Ontarians in a large-scale constituti­on-making project would be difficult and complex but it would give Ford three crucial victories where he needs them most: in public policy, in the political arena, and in popular perception.

First, it would give Ford a good survey of what the people want from their government as he enters the second half of his first term.

In the political arena, this historic moment for the province would overshadow much of the mostly bad news about the new government generated so far by Ford himself. The Premier could instead bask in the glow of media coverage of his innovative, exciting, and forwardloo­king plan for collective action.

And finally, in light of his innumerabl­e cuts across the board, Ford risks becoming frozen in the public imaginatio­n as “Doug the Destroyer” criss-crossing the province to tear down what others before him have built. Better to build something with a high purpose and be seen as doing it in furtheranc­e of our shared values as Ontarians.

“Doug the Democrat” and “Father of Ontario’s Constituti­on” both have a nice ring.

The premier says he wants to empower the people on main street, not the elites on Bay Street. Here is his opportunit­y to do that.

 ??  ?? Richard Albert is a professor of law at the University of Texas at Austin, a former law clerk for chief justice Beverley McLachlin, and an author.
Richard Albert is a professor of law at the University of Texas at Austin, a former law clerk for chief justice Beverley McLachlin, and an author.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada