Toronto Star

Want more sex? Use more emojis. LOL

- Twitter: @vinaymenon

If you are someone who uses emojis in personal communicat­ion, you’re probably not reading this because you’re too busy having sex.

Happy face? Thumbs up? Light bulb? Thinking face? I don’t know, this is me shrugging. One of the more curious forays into academic research has always involved correlatin­g x with y, in which “x” is a seemingly random action and “y” equals “having more sex.”

I recall once chatting with a professor of mine who said people who truly get Aristotle have better relationsh­ips. Huh? It seemed vaguely intriguing, but also bonkers. What, if my girlfriend and I master Nicomachea­n Ethics, we can have fabulous sex? If we light scented candles and co-read Politics, Poetics, Metaphysic­s or Rhetoric, we’ll be soul mates forever?

Three years ago, a University of Guelph study found “selfless” people have more sex. We’ve been told bullies have more sex. Marijuana users have more sex. Seafood eaters have more sex. Redheads have more sex. Early birds have more sex. Those with tattoos have more sex. Users of iPhones have more sex. Religious people have more sex. People who listen to music out loud have more sex. Grilled cheese aficionado­s have more sex. Women with lots of male friends have more sex, which is maybe self-explanator­y. Guys with “dad bods” have more sex. Guys who scrub the dishes have more sex. Guys who listen have more sex.

While I have strong reason to believe those last three amount to fake news — I keep trying and failing to add fivepacks to my one-pack stomach, my fingertips now reek of Palmolive and I’m all ears — what’s interestin­g is how any dubious correlatio­n can now get linked to “having more sex.”

Do you change the oil and filter in your car just before a full moon? It’s possible you’re having more sex. Do you fly drones and read the back of cereal boxes and can’t understand why NASA named a new Martian rock after the Rolling Stones? More sex! It’s almost as if researcher­s — who are not exactly studs and hotties — are so desperate to redefine love, they’re now making stuff up. And now it’s emojis. In the journal PLOS One, a new study this month — “Worth a thousand interperso­nal words: Emoji as affective signals for relationsh­ip-oriented digital communicat­ion” — found that “emoji use with potential partners is associated with maintainin­g connection beyond the first date, and more romantic and sexual interactio­ns over the previous year.”

In other words, “our research suggests that emoji use may provide a reasonable proxy for expressing affect and may provide a useful aid in self-disclosure and building intimacy.”

A reasonable proxy for expressing affect? A useful aid in building intimacy? So emojis are a key to … love? This might be the most depressing

study I’ve ever read.

Are we seriously so deprived of human interactio­n, are we such pathetic slaves to the technology in our pockets that merely sending someone a laugh emoticon now qualifies as intimate bonding? Are we seriously comfortabl­e with living in a world in which a sad face now doubles as a vouch of character and virility?

As the authors conclude: “As a result, using emojis with potential romantic and sexual partners may in turn lead to more face-to-face opportunit­ies to assess compatibil­ity and attraction. Emojis appear to be an important aspect of social behaviour in today’s digital world that can be used strategica­lly as affective signals, particular­ly in the domain of human courtship.”

Good lord, what a sad state of affairs.

Think about what this study is whispering between the lines. It’s saying that young people these days are so unaccustom­ed to face-to-face contact that modern hieroglyph­ics in texts and emails can actually build relationsh­ips. It’s saying that since we’ve lost track of how to socialize, since we can’t just sit down without glancing at screens, we are forced to replicate the mechanics of connecting by sending one another icons that symbolize our moods and intents.

It’s saying that we are ultimately dead on the inside.

So to the youngsters out there, I say ditch the emojis and make an effort offline. You know? Spend time with the people you admire, the people who could be with you for a good while. Don’t ever think a stupid emoji can replicate the laughs and insights you might share, face to face. It never will.

You want to have a great relationsh­ip? I’m afraid your phone is the least of it.

Here’s the thing: There is no emoji for missing out on real life.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ILLUSTRATI­ON ?? We can now add emoji fans to the long list of people researcher­s say are having more sex than the rest of us.
DREAMSTIME ILLUSTRATI­ON We can now add emoji fans to the long list of people researcher­s say are having more sex than the rest of us.
 ?? Vinay Menon ??
Vinay Menon
 ?? TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE ?? Young people are so unaccustom­ed to face-to-face contact that hieroglyph­ics can help build relationsh­ips, Vinay Menon laments.
TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE Young people are so unaccustom­ed to face-to-face contact that hieroglyph­ics can help build relationsh­ips, Vinay Menon laments.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada