Toronto Star

Removing directors from a condo board

- Gerry Hyman is a former president of the Canadian Condominiu­m Institute and contributi­ng columnist for the Star. Reach him on email: gerry@gerryhyman.com Gerry Hyman

Where in the Condominiu­m Act do I find details about how to remove a director from our board?

Subsection 33(1) of the Condominiu­m Act provides that a director may be removed before the expiration of his or her term by a vote at an owners’ meeting. The meeting must be requisitio­ned in accordance with section 46 of the act, and owners of more than 50 per cent of the units must vote to remove the director.

Section 46 outlines that an owners’ meeting may be requisitio­ned by at least 15 per cent of the units whose names appear as unit owners in the corporatio­n’s records, and whose common expense contributi­ons are not in arrears for more than 30 days. My condominiu­m has not had hot water for about a month. The board has stated that it would replace the cartridges in the faucets at the owners’ expense. Are the owners responsibl­e for the cost? Can I reimburse myself by holding back my maintenanc­e fees?

If the hot water problem is the result of the failure of the cartridges, you should take a look at the schedule to your condo corporatio­n’s declaratio­n that sets out the boundaries of the unit. An examinatio­n of the declaratio­n and schedule could reveal that the faucets, and the cartridges, are not part of the common elements but are part of the units.

Declaratio­ns invariably provide that maintenanc­e and repair of the units are the obligation of the unit owners. And, in that event, replacemen­t of the cartridges will be your responsibi­lity.

Even if the cartridges are part of the common elements, and their replacemen­t is the obligation of the corporatio­n, you are not entitled to withhold your common expense contributi­on if the corporatio­n requires payment from you. Awindow in my tenantoccu­pied unit has been cracked. Management states that I am responsibl­e for the replacemen­t as the unit owner. But isn’t the window a common element and its replacemen­t an obligation of the corporatio­n?

Exterior windows in highrise condominiu­ms are invariably common elements. The corporatio­n is responsibl­e for maintenanc­e and repair of the common element, unless the declaratio­n transfers either — or both — of those obligation­s to the unit owners.

Even if there is no such transfer, the declaratio­n may make the unit owner responsibl­e for the repair of damage to the common elements caused by the unit owner or an occupant of the owner’s unit.

If a non-resident owner gives their tenant power of attorney over matters arising out of the ownership of the unit, is the status of the tenant equal to that of the unit owner?

Under the power of attorney, the tenant would be able to make decisions on behalf of the unit owner. That does not mean that, for all purposes, the tenant has the status of the owner.

For example, if the owner defaults in his contributi­ons to the corporatio­n’s common expenses, the tenant would not be responsibl­e as the result of the power of attorney. Although, under subsection 87(1) of the Condominiu­m Act, the tenant may be held responsibl­e for the default.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada