Toronto Star

One instance when owners may chip in to replace windows

- Gerry Hyman Gerry Hyman is a former president of the Canadian Condominiu­m Institute and contributi­ng columnist for the Star. Reach him on email: gerry@gerryhyman.com

Our corporatio­n has levied a special assessment to replace windows in the building. Aren’t the windows a common element and the corporatio­n’s obligation to replace — meaning the cost shouldn’t be assessed against the owners?

The windows in a condominiu­m building are invariably common elements. If the windows have failed, it is the obligation of the corporatio­n to replace them.

The cost will be part of the corporatio­n’s common expenses, which each owner will share in accordance with the corporatio­n’s declaratio­n.

When paid from the reserve fund, the owners will not be assessed for the amount of the necessary window replacemen­t. However, if the payment reduces the reserve fund below the amount required, then the owners may be assessed to restore the fund to its proper level.

If the windows haven’t failed, but the board wishes to replace them by more attractive windows — or more modern windows with more effective opening and closing mechanisms — the corporatio­n could only replace the windows in accordance with section 97 of the Condominiu­m Act as alteration­s to the common elements. Section 97 allows the corporatio­n to make such an alteration if it is required by a mutual use agreement, to which the corporatio­n is a party. Section 97 also allows it if the alteration is necessary to ensure the safety or security of persons using the condominiu­m property, or of the condominiu­m’s assets. As well, it is also allowed if the cost of the alteration is no more than one per cent of the annual budget of the corporatio­n for the current fiscal.

The reserve fund may only be used for repairs to the common elements and cannot be used for alteration­s to the common elements.

If none of the conditions exist which would permit the corporatio­n to make a common element alteration without notice to the owners, the corporatio­n may only make the alteration by sending a notice to the owners which describes the proposed alteration and sets out the estimated cost and how the corporatio­n proposes to pay it.

The notice must advise that the owners have the right within 30 days of receiving the notice to requisitio­n an owners’ meeting to vote on the proposed alteration.

A requisitio­n for an owners’ meeting must be signed by owners of at least 15 per cent of the units.

The corporatio­n could only proceed with the alteration if the owners do not requisitio­n an owners’ meeting or if the owners do not vote against the alteration at the requisitio­ned meeting.

If the alteration is substantia­l, the corporatio­n will not be able to proceed by sending the notice but must obtain an affirmativ­e vote to the alteration by owners of at least 662⁄ 3 per cent of the units. An alteration is considered substantia­l if the estimated cost exceeds 10 per cent of the budgeted common expenses for the corporatio­n’s current fiscal year, or is greater than an amount set out in regulation­s under the Condominiu­m Act, or if the board elects to treat the cost as substantia­l.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? New condo windows must be financed according to whether they’re needed for safety reasons or wanted for esthetics.
DREAMSTIME New condo windows must be financed according to whether they’re needed for safety reasons or wanted for esthetics.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada