Toronto Star

Should you take the train? Ask yourself these questions

Answer to whether you should travel by rail isn’t always clear-cut

- CHRISTOPHE­R ELLIOTT THE WASHINGTON POST

If you’re visiting Southern California, taking the train from Los Angeles to San Diego makes sense — on one level. You’ll see the area’s iconic beaches, strawberry fields and historic railway stations without having to worry about highway traffic.

On another level, it doesn’t make any sense at all.

Round-trip tickets for my family of four on the Pacific Surfliner cost $324, and the trip takes about an hour longer than driving (assuming the train is on time). As much as I wanted to reduce our carbon footprint, atank of gas for our Honda CRV costs only $78. Plus, we weren’t limited by Amtrak’s schedules.

Still, more travellers are asking a question they haven’t for years, perhaps even for generation­s: Should I take the train or drive? It’s not always as clearcut as it was for me.

Why are we having this discussion now? There is a deepening collective realizatio­n that travel is harmful to the planet. The flight-shaming movement denounces the environmen­tal damage caused by air travel; the slow-travel movement emphasizes longer stays; and the “micro-cation” trend speaks to the increasing popularity of vacationin­g closer to home.

So should you take the train? Ask yourself these questions:

Where are you headed?

Some countries have a reputation for first-rate rail systems. “I found the trains in Germany and Switzerlan­d are clean, efficient and on schedule,” says Nicholas Wolaver, a communicat­ions consultant from Atlanta. “A journey from Munich to Lausanne, for instance, took about a day.” He made a few stops and explored several cities along the way.

Is the ride a destinatio­n unto itself ? “Take the train when it’s a must-do experience,” says Kristine Thorndyke, a teacher based in Shanghai. That would include a trip on such a famously scenic route as the one traversed by the Coastal Classic between Anchorage and Seward in Alaska or the Glacier Express between Zermatt and St. Moritz in Switzerlan­d — in other words, the rail equivalent of crossing the Atlantic on the Queen Elizabeth 2.

How’s the traffic? One of the best reasons to take a train, at least in the United States, is to avoid road congestion in metropolit­an areas. “I usually choose the train, especially when I am in New York, to avoid traffic,” says Melanie DiSalvo, an apparel supply chain consultant in New York. The Acela from Washington to New York takes just three hours 20 minutes on average — roughly an hour less than driving.

What about other delays? In Europe, you can use a simple calculatio­n to decide whether to take the train or fly, says Nadia Elizabeth, a U.K.-based travel blogger. “If the train takes less than five hours, it’s almost always better than flying because that’s the minimum time you’ll spend mucking about on even the shortest intra-Europe flight.” You have to factor in travel time to the airport, security delays and other airport hassles. And remember, unlike an airplane, the train usually takes you right to the centre of town.

Are there any hidden fees? Renting a car may seem inexpensiv­e, but other factors associated with travel by car can affect your trip. Consider what happened to Stephen Guerriero, a middle school teacher from Needham, Mass., on a recent trip to Europe. “We incurred a 150-euro penalty in Slovenia for not understand­ing their weird tolling system,” Guerriero says. “And gas is crazy expensive.” In Italy, he suffered more toll-related penalties, and in Spain, he got two speeding tickets whose cost was increased further by the rental company’s processing fees.

When I visited California recently, I decided to leave the car at home and boarded the Pacific Surfliner for San Diego. Constructi­on on the tracks caused a two-hour delay. Once underway, the kids and I spent our time staring out the window and watching Southern California go by — beaches, small towns, big cities, highways. The Surfliner was almost empty, but there were plenty of cars on the highway. We were happy to avoid them, and maybe lessen our carbon footprint a little, too.

We’re spending 2020 in Europe, and we’ll be buying a Eurail pass to get around. If we need a car for a few days, we’ll rent one from an agency such as Auto Europe. For us, the question of taking the train versus driving will default to “train” for the next year. I’ll let you know how that goes.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? Taking the train is an eco-friendly alternativ­e to driving.
DREAMSTIME Taking the train is an eco-friendly alternativ­e to driving.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada