Toronto Star

PM fights perception of family ties to WE

Trudeau calls for further ‘due diligence’ on plan to outsource $544M program

- ALEX BALLINGALL

OTTAWA— Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says his call for further “due diligence” on a proposal to outsource a $544-million program to WE Charity was to defend against inevitable questions about his family’s ties to the Toronto-based organizati­on.

Even though he spotted “red flags” in the proposal from the public service to award the program to a charity that has given his wife, mother and brother tens of thousands of dollars for fees and expenses, Trudeau said Friday that he did not discuss it with the House of Commons’ conflict of interest and ethics commission­er.

Instead, he said he asked the public service to “triple check” their claim that only WE Charity — and not the government or any other private organizati­on — could deliver the grant program for student volunteers to make sure it was “the hard and cold truth.”

That way, Trudeau said he could explain the decision when questions came up around “perception­s” of his family’s ties to the organizati­on.

“The extra due diligence I asked for was really about being able to stand in front of Canadians and to stand in front of critiques from the opposition that were undoubtedl­y to come,” the prime minister told reporters in Ottawa.

“The concerns around the personal connection­s that my family had were all around perception,” he added. “We needed to make sure that the public service and others could stand up and say, ‘No — the decision to go with WE was because they are the right organizati­on to deliver this, and indeed the only organizati­on to deliver this.’ ”

Trudeau was elaboratin­g after his extraordin­ary appearance before a parliament­ary committee on Thursday, in which he weathered questions from opposition MPs amid a controvers­y that has enveloped the Liberal minority government in the weeks since the prime minister announced a $912million grant program for student volunteers on June 25.

The prime minister testified that he was presented with a recommenda­tion from the public service on May 8 to outsource the initiative to WE Charity, a youth service organizati­on founded by Toronto’s Marc and Craig Kielburger. Trudeau said he had expected the government’s Canada Service Corps to head the program and that he was also concerned how the public would see ties that he and other members of his government have with WE if they awarded the charity a massive program.

That’s why Trudeau said he pulled the proposal from his cabinet agenda that day and asked public servants to goover the proposal again to ensure there was no other option. By May 22, Trudeau said this was done and his cabinet approved the plan, which ended up involving a deal to pay WE up to $43.5 million to administer up to $500 million in volunteer grants.

The prime minister and Finance Minister Bill Morneau — who said he would repay WE more than $41,000 for trips that he and his family took with the organizati­on in 2017 — have since apologized for participat­ing in that decision. The program has now been cancelled and Trudeau and Morneau are each facing an ethics probe over whether they broke parliament’s Conflict of Interest Act, a law Trudeau has already violated twice as prime minister.

Regarding his ties with WE, the prime minister said this week that his wife’s role with the organizati­on — as an unpaid podcast host and event speaker whose travel expenses are covered by WE — was cleared by the ethics commission­er. But asked Friday whether he or his staff had gone back to discuss the proposal to outsource a massive government program to WE with the commission­er,

Trudeau said, “No, we did not.” and that his wife’s link with the group was “pre-cleared.”

The commission­er’s office says it can’t comment on any discussion­s with office holders about the Conflict of Interest Act. In a statement Friday, Conservati­ve Leader Andrew Scheer questioned whether there was any “additional scrutiny,” pointing to reports of problems with WE that “should have disqualifi­ed them from receiving government funding.”

Former WE staffers have told the Star the organizati­on exaggerate­s its reach with youth, while the Kielburger brothers told the committee this week the entity laid off about 200 staff in March because of financial troubles during the pandemic.

Scheer also pointed to testimony from Katie Telford, Trudeau’s chief of staff, that an official in the Prime Minister’s Office spoke with WE on May 5 — the same day the outsourcin­g plan was endorsed by the government’s COVID-19 committee and that WE started working on the program. Cabinet didn’t approve it until 17 days later.

“It’s clear that this program was never about helping students. It was about bailing out the prime minister’s friends,” Scheer’s statement said.

Asked Friday why WE started working on the program more than two weeks before it was approved, Trudeau pointed to the Kielburger’s explanatio­n that they were willing to risk losing money spent getting it started if it was ultimately rejected by the government.

“They knew how important it was to get this program out, and they assumed certain risks in going forward and starting to spend on a program that hadn’t yet been approved,” he said.

 ?? CHRIS YOUNG THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he asked the public service to “triple check” its claim that only WE Charity — and not the government or any other private organizati­on — could deliver the grant program for student volunteers to make sure it was “the hard and cold truth.”
CHRIS YOUNG THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he asked the public service to “triple check” its claim that only WE Charity — and not the government or any other private organizati­on — could deliver the grant program for student volunteers to make sure it was “the hard and cold truth.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada