Toronto Star

‘Desperate’ optometris­ts’ wage protest costs Ontario $250K a day

Critics say eye doctors using patients as ‘cannon fodder’ in fight over compensati­on

- JESSE MCLEAN STAFF REPORTER

As a funding dispute with the province intensifie­s, Ontario optometris­ts are redirectin­g patients to emergency department­s, part of a negotiatio­n tactic costing the public health system $250,000 a day.

The job action, the financial details of which are described in internal communicat­ions by the Ontario Associatio­n of Optometris­ts, is facing criticism for treating patients like chess pieces during a pandemic, unnecessar­ily sending them to hospitals that have worked to maximize capacity to handle COVID-19.

The internal communicat­ions show the associatio­n is encouragin­g its more than 1,700 members to redirect at least one patient a day to emergency department­s or other health-care providers.

That means a patient experienci­ng something flashing or floating in her vision, who would normally be examined by an optometris­t, is instead being sent to an ER at a significan­tly greater cost to the public health system.

“Once we start hitting the half a million dollar mark in redirectio­n costs ... this is a leverage point to get commitment from the government to fix the funding problem,” associatio­n president Dr. Sheldon Salaba wrote in a July email distribute­d to optometris­ts.

In an interview, Salaba said it was a “difficult decision” to pursue a job action that “turned patients away or denied them care.”

“We’re in a desperate situation. We can’t afford to see these patients in this environmen­t because of this funding inequality,” he said.

“I understand that it’s inconvenie­nt for people. I don’t like having to go to an emergency room myself ... but we didn’t create this problem,” he said, saying the blame lies at the feet of “successive government­s (that) have failed to come to the table and find sustainabl­e funding solutions for optometric services.”

Salaba said the optometris­ts’ associatio­n, which represents close to 70 per cent of the province’s optometris­ts, chose emergency rooms with patient care in mind, as they have the necessary equipment to properly diagnose patients’ eye issues.

The Ontario Health Insurance Plan covers optometry services for people under 20 or 65 years and older, as well as individual­s of any age with certain medical conditions. These OHIP-covered patients make up roughly 70 per cent of Ontario optometris­ts’ practices, Salaba said.

But remunerati­on for these services has barely changed over the last 30 years, and the modest increases in funding are dwarfed by the rate of inflation, Salaba said.

It costs at least $80 to $90 to see a patient, but the province reimburses only $44 on average, Salaba said.

That means Ontario’s optometris­ts are spending $173 million a year to subsidize the province’s eyecare system, he said.

The precarious financial footing has been weakened by COVID-19, with most optometry clinics reporting a revenue drop between 75 per cent and 85 per cent since March, according to the associatio­n.

The decision to funnel patients to emergency department­s as a negotiatin­g tactic is concerning, said Dionne Aleman, an associate professor at the University of Toronto who specialize­s in pandemic planning.

“Sending people to an emergency department right now, even though public prevalence across the province is pretty low, is putting people at a really unnecessar­y health risk and exposure level to COVID,” Aleman said.

“If I was a patient who had some kind of minor optometry problem and my optometris­t sent me to an (emergency department), I would feel like cannon fodder in their fight with the province. I would not be OK with that, personally.”

She said the unnecessar­y influx of patients also puts an added burden on emergency department­s that for years have struggled to promptly treat people.

Assuming a redirected patient does not in fact have an urgent health problem, the person will be triaged as a lower priority.

“They might end up spending all day waiting in an emergency department while patients with actual emergency issues are seen ahead of them,” Aleman said. “It’s basically a huge waste of a patient’s time.”

Salaba said he does not think the job action is putting patients at undue risk.

“The environmen­t we’re in now is dramatical­ly different than it was at the beginning of the pandemic. Case counts are very low.

“An emergency room is as safe a place to be seen, I would think right now, as our offices would be,” he said.

The job action was launched in mid-June. As of mid-July, 43 per cent of the patients redirected from optometris­ts were being sent to emergency department­s, according to Salaba’s internal message to the optometris­t associatio­n. Most of the remaining patients — 41 per cent — were being sent to physicians.

In the email, Salaba said by sending all redirected patients to ERs instead of family physicians, the job action could cost OHIP $400,000 a day.

In a statement, the office of Health Minister Christine Elliott said payments for OHIPinsure­d optometry services have risen as the number of patients seen grows. “We expect optometris­ts to continue to deliver the quality care that patients expect and deserve, as they always have,” the statement reads.

Salaba called the province’s comments “misleading,” and said a growing number of patients does not make the system any less unsustaina­ble if optometris­ts must continue covering half the cost of their services.

“If this is allowed to continue and our offices close, then the access to care becomes permanent and people will definitely fall through the cracks,” he said. “We need a public commitment from the province to work with us to fix the problem.”

The College of Optometris­ts of Ontario, which regulates the profession, is closely monitoring the job action and has advised optometris­ts to consider how withdrawin­g services may adversely impact patients.

College president Dr. Patrick Quaid said the regulator is less concerned about whether an optometris­t is seeing or redirectin­g a patient and more focused on ensuring patients receive timely care.

“The patient should not be abandoned,” he said.

“If (optometris­ts are) delegating or triaging to someone else, you want to follow up to make sure that patient actually got seen.”

He said he’s hopeful “level heads will prevail” and the province and optometris­ts reach a resolution.

“Ultimately, if the job action escalates, it’s very likely it will be the public who will pay the price for it,” Quaid said.

“Sending people to an emergency department right now is putting people at a really unnecessar­y health risk and exposure level to COVID.”

DIONNE ALEMAN UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

 ?? GARY YOKOYAMA THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR FILE PHOTO ?? Dr. Sheldon Salaba is the president of the Ontario Associatio­n of Optometris­ts, which is encouragin­g its members to redirect at least one patient a day to emergency rooms to protest what it calls decades of underfundi­ng from the public health system.
GARY YOKOYAMA THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR FILE PHOTO Dr. Sheldon Salaba is the president of the Ontario Associatio­n of Optometris­ts, which is encouragin­g its members to redirect at least one patient a day to emergency rooms to protest what it calls decades of underfundi­ng from the public health system.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada