Toronto Star

Is there really any hope for a green recovery?

- TRISTAN JACKSON CONTRIBUTO­R

Alarmed by West Coast wildfires and Gulf Coast hurricanes, I decided to go carbon-free, and swore off resource extraction. News of Green Recovery coming out of COVID-19 signals we’ve reached a turning point. It’s time for decisive action.

We can agree that creating new jobs, going carbon-free and extraction-free are all necessary steps. We recognize the need to achieve sustainabi­lity. Anything less, by definition, is self-defeating.

But, sitting down to assess my new zero-carbon, zero-extraction lifestyle, I hit a few snags.

A full life-cycle cost analysis (LCA) of breakfast options revealed I’d be eating air. Not because food cannot be produced without fossil fuel inputs and metals — it can — but because, in the developed world, it isn’t. Today’s population lives on industrial processes.

Farms are worked with machines made of metal, rubber, plastic and glass, running on fossil fuel. Fertilizer­s are extracted from mines (phosphate, potassium) and natural gas (nitrogen). Food gets from farm to plate in fossil-powered vehicles. Even the plate is from a mine (ceramic) or oil (plastic).

Turning on my computer, I checked the research on life-cycle costs of renewable energy, and the sourcing of raw materials. Of course, the computer, the wires bringing power to it, the equipment producing the power, all the IT infrastruc­ture came out of mines and oil wells. Even10 per cent of the world’s gold production goes into electronic devices; not to mention copper, nickel, aluminum, lead, lithium, cobalt, silica — and the list goes on. All non-renewable.

Materials aside, energy, itself, can be renewable. Right? It depends. Production in China, where most of the world’s solar panels are made, is mostly powered by coal. Solar panels, large batteries, even wind turbines can have a hefty “embedded” environmen­tal footprint.

Daunting as these challenges are, we need to make this shift. We need to disrupt our dependence on fossil energy and on taking non-renewable materials out of the ground. That’s what Green Recovery is all about; recovery to restart the economy, and green to get it heading in the right direction.

We hear calls to “divest from fossil fuels.” Worldwide, there are tens of trillions of dollars invested in the fossil fuel and extractive materials sectors. Divesting implies someone buys the assets and they remain in use — meaning no environmen­tal benefit; or, the assets are abandoned and their value goes to zero — meaning economic catastroph­e.

These investment­s are tied up in pension plans, wealth funds, bank balance sheets, millions of jobs, retirement income sources, and so on. The economy is a complex machine, and it runs (mostly) on oil and extraction industries. Data, the internet, apps, tech companies, all create value in the economy, but they are secondary to energy and materials. Tech doesn’t work without those inputs.

Back to earth with my aspiration to live zero-carbon and zero-extraction. How do we wean ourselves off energy sources, installed systems, business models, flows of power, materials, and money, that are so deeply tied into our way of life? Is there any hope for a Green Recovery? Yes, of course. We need a Green Recovery, but we need to get it right.

It’s not about “what.” Ultimately, sustainabi­lity is existentia­l. It’s about “how.” And “how” is more complicate­d than is easily grasped. It will take all of us thinking and working together.

How do we cover the costs of employment displaceme­nt and churn? How do we protect the value of assets that are shifting out of use when the book value of those assets is central to our entire economy? How to we ensure the embedded footprint of new technologi­es is less than the value those technologi­es bring? How do we transition fast enough, but not too fast?

The Task Force for a Resilient Recovery has begun to plan the way, recommendi­ng a $55.4-billion federal investment in Green Recovery. It’s a good start. But, we’ll need a lot more investment and a lot more working together to sort through the challenges to get there, and to minimize our losses along the way.

Green Recovery and a sustainabl­e economy are complex issues. We won’t make it without an absolutely massive, focused, collaborat­ive effort. Are you in? If yes, the tools exist. It’s time we assess our investment options.

 ?? Tristan Jackson is chief strategy officer at VECKTA, a software company focusing on Distribute­d Energy Systems (DES). ??
Tristan Jackson is chief strategy officer at VECKTA, a software company focusing on Distribute­d Energy Systems (DES).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada