Toronto Star

Name the stigmas you can’t live with

- Joe Richer Joe Richer is registrar of the Real Estate Council of Ontario (RECO) and contributo­r for the Star. Follow him on Twitter: @RECOhelps

I’m looking to purchase a home in a historic district, but I want to be sure that it isn’t haunted. Do you have any advice?

It’s fun to be able to address this issue on Halloween weekend.

I’m sure many stories of haunted houses are being exchanged to mark the occasion. Naturally, these stories have some asking the question: “Could you live at that address?” For many the answer is an unwavering “No!” For others, it would be fine, especially if they can get a deal on the home.

Fortunatel­y, for those who would object, many of the spooktacul­ar addresses from the big screen — such as 1428 Elm St., in Springwood, Ohio — are fictional and will never appear for sale. That said, the actual house in which “A Nightmare on Elm Street” was filmed is a private residence in Los Angeles, Calif.

But what about real properties that are thought to be haunted, like the home of my friends who claimed it had a friendly ghost they called Mr. Zitch? Or historical homes that may have an unsettling history? Whether you believe in restless spirits or paranormal activity, the subject is something that is addressed in real estate transactio­ns.

In the context of real estate, a “stigma” can be defined as a non-physical, intangible attribute of a property that may elicit a psychologi­cal or emotional response. There may have been an event or circumstan­ce that occurred in or near the property that does not affect the property’s appearance or function, but might be considered by some as emotionall­y disquietin­g.

Examples of stigmas may include:

> The location where a tragic event occurred;

> An interior or exterior with poor feng shui;

> An address with unlucky numbers;

> A property where a serious crime has occurred; and,

> A location where someone has died — a young person’s death can be especially stigmatizi­ng.

What one person finds unacceptab­le may not be a stigma to another. Generally speaking, sellers are not required to disclose psychologi­cal stigmas relating to a property. Stigmas are personal and fall under the doctrine of caveat emptor, or buyer beware, meaning you should take steps to satisfy yourself that a property is free of what you may consider to be a stigma.

This is why it is important that you have an honest and direct conversati­on with your salesperso­n regarding anything you may consider a stigma. By bringing it to their attention, your rep can ask the seller about the history of their property and any existence of stigmas that you have identified.

You may also want to do some independen­t research. You can search online and go through local archives; neighbouri­ng residents can often be a good source of informatio­n, too.

My advice to sellers who have informatio­n about a property that could be seen as a stigma is to speak with their salesperso­ns to have a fulsome discussion about the issue. You may also want to speak with your real estate lawyer about what you may want, or need, to disclose.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada