Toronto Star

Spat between Amazon, Future heats up

- BHUMA SHRIVASTAV­A AND UPMANYU TRIVEDI BLOOMBERG

A legal spat between Amazon.com Inc. and its Indian partner that started before an arbitrator in Singapore just got fiercer in a court in New Delhi.

The U.S. e-commerce giant and Future Group, whose assets billionair­e Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Industries Ltd. recently agreed to buy for $3.4 billion (all figures U.S.), are locked in a dispute over that deal. Amazon says Future violated a contract with the sale to its rival and wants to halt it, while the indebted Mumbaibase­d firm says it would collapse if the transactio­n were to fail.

The Jeff Bezos-led e-tailer has accused Future and its founder Kishore Biyani of flouting disclosure rules, according to court filings seen by Bloomberg. Future’s disclosure­s were “made as per the applicable requiremen­ts,” the company said in an email, refuting the allegation­s. Amazon has also written to the Competitio­n Commission of India asking it not to approve the takeover until arbitratio­n proceeding­s are complete.

While Amazon, Future and Reliance await a verdict, the legal wrangling is threatenin­g to unravel India’s biggest retail acquisitio­n. But why is the world’s largest e-commerce company seeking to derail a deal that’s essentiall­y bailing out a beleaguere­d retailer, whose market v of its own? Here’s what we know so far: 1. What led to the feud? Amazon, in early October, accused Future Group of breaching terms of a mutual agreement by announcing an asset sale deal with Reliance, the conglomera­te helmed by Asia’s richest man. Amazon had bought 49 per cent in one of Future’s unlisted firms last year, with the right to buy into the listed flagship Future Retail Ltd. after a few years. But the retailer ran into a severe cash crunch when India went into a lockdown in March to curb the coronaviru­s outbreak.

In May, Amazon was considerin­g increasing its stake in Future Retail, people familiar with the matter said at the time. But no such transactio­n materializ­ed quickly and Future cut a deal with Reliance, infuriatin­g Amazon. The U.S. firm claims that its contract with the unlisted Future unit barred a transactio­n with a number of persons and companies, including Ambani and Reliance.

2. What’s the fight really about?

The fight is essentiall­y for the dominance of India’s estimated $1-trillion consumer retail market.

Reliance is already the country’s biggest brick-and-mortar retailer. Acquiring Future’s retail, wholesale, logistics and warehousin­g units would almost double its footprint and give it unparallel­ed edge over rivals. Blocking Reliance is crucial for Amazon if it wants to hold sway over the only billionpeo­ple-plus consumer market still open to foreign firms. 3. What did the Singapore arbitratio­n court say?

After accusing Future of breaching its contract, Amazon secured emergency relief from an arbitratio­n court in Singapore on Oct. 25 that temporaril­y restrained Future Group from going ahead with the asset sale.

Future and Reliance maintain that the Singapore court’s interim ruling is not binding, but Amazon wrote to local regulators flagging it as a binding order. Future Retail has now petitioned the Delhi High Court urging it to bar Amazon from meddling in its asset sale by writing to local antitrust and market regulators.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada