Toronto Star

Biden’s quixotic and problemati­c quest for American unity

- SHIRA LURIE CONTRIBUTO­R is the University College Fellow in early American history at the University of Toronto. She holds a PhD in history from the University of Virginia. Follow her on Twitter: @ShiraLurie

In his inaugural address, exactly two weeks removed from an attempted coup by violent insurgents, U.S. President Joe Biden called for an end to the “uncivil war that pits red against blue.” “Unity,” he told the nation “is the path forward.”

Biden has sung the same tune throughout his campaign, repeatedly stating his intention to heal the divisions plaguing American politics and life.

Although soothing on the surface, Biden’s calls for unity are damaging to both Democratic aspiration­s and a healthy political culture. This is because they are feeding one of the most persistent and pernicious myths in American politics: the existence of a national consensus.

This myth holds that most Americans share a basic unanimity of sentiment. Divisions occur when ambitious politician­s and their supporters deliberate­ly disrupt that unanimity. By artificial­ly dividing public opinion, politician­s can win and hold power.

The myth of American consensus is as old as the nation itself. It originated with the first citizens of the United States, who viewed political parties as evil and rejected the concept of a loyal opposition. Rather than understand­ing party conflict as a competitio­n in which each side vied for power in a series of elections, Americans saw their political opponents as enemies who inflamed public opinion for their own gain. Each party aimed to destroy the other and restore the national consensus.

While Americans eventually warmed to the legitimacy of political parties, the notion that partisansh­ip sows unnecessar­y division has, of course, persisted.

But partisansh­ip does not create division, it channels it. And that can be a good thing. Honest and substantiv­e partisan debate ensures that multiple viewpoints are heard and that compromise is attainable. Partisan conflict is how nations build consensus, not destroy it.

The problem is that the myth of American consensus has turned partisansh­ip into tribalism. By casting the opposing party as a disruptive and illegitima­te fringe, Americans make meaningful debate and compromise all but impossible. The solution is not a Sisyphean search for unity, a truce in the “war that pits red against blue,” but an embrace of partisansh­ip as an integral part of the political process.

American consensus has proved elusive to all who have sought it because it is not real.

And Democrats’ insistence that unity is both achievable and worth pursuing has only weakened them. It is why calls for bipartisan­ship are always about Democrats appeasing Republican­s and not the other way around. It is why the Republican rejoinder to almost any Democratic action is that it is divisive.

If Biden and the Democrats hold any hope of enacting the progressiv­e changes and structural reforms the nation so badly needs, they must abandon the fallacy of national unity. Imagine the things Sisyphus could have accomplish­ed had he not been condemned to fruitlessl­y push a boulder up a hill. Shira Lurie

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada