Toronto Star

Enough with obstacle courses of danger

- Matt Elliott Twitter: @GraphicMat­t

Big number: 614, the number of active restrictio­ns on Toronto streets caused by constructi­on and other activities this past Sunday, with 133 of them classified as major.

I was walking up Parliament Street a few weeks back when I encountere­d my most hated type of Toronto signage: “Sidewalk Closed — Pedestrian­s Use Other Sidewalk.”

These signs, found frequently at constructi­on sites, are a scourge for pedestrian­s, turning the city into the world’s least fun obstacle course. They show up with little advance warning, and the suggestion that people just “use other sidewalk” is often easier said than done.

For example, as I stood there on Parliament Street, near a constructi­on site for a condo promising potential residents “a neighbourh­ood of authentic charm and understate­d community” and also an on-site pet spa, obeying the sign and using the sidewalk on the other side of the street would have meant doubling back a couple of hundred metres and waiting for a traffic light to change. Call me reckless, but I wasn’t going to do that — instead, I stepped into the road and bypassed the closed section of sidewalk.

A couple of days later, my nemesis the “Sidewalk Closed” sign confronted me again. This time it was on Jarvis Street, underneath the rail overpass. Here the sign presented itself as a kind of unsolvable riddle, as the sidewalks on both sides of the street were blocked by constructi­on. Obeying the “Use Other Sidewalk” directive would have me ping-ponging between sides of the road, endlessly, forever. In the end, I just risked walking through the constructi­on site.

Forgive me if this sounds like whining, but I’m tired of this. I get that constructi­on is an unavoidabl­e reality in this city, but the lack of care for safety at a lot of constructi­on sites makes getting around this city more frustratin­g and dangerous than it should be.

And I say that as a relatively young person with no major disabiliti­es. Navigating some of the sidewalk closings or obstructio­ns I’ve seen this summer in a wheelchair, or with a stroller, or just as someone who isn’t entirely steady on their feet, would be nearly impossible.

Cyclists face similar frustratio­ns with constructi­on sites. The dreaded “Bike Lane Closed — Cyclists Merge With Traffic” sign might as well read “Time To Risk Your Life.” And, of course, constructi­on sites draw lots of heavy trucks, which can be deadly for those travelling on two wheels, like the city saw last month with the tragic death of Miguel Joshua Escanan who was hit by the driver of a cement truck just north of the constructi­on site at Avenue Road and Bloor Street.

Something needs to change, because there’s no indication the amount of constructi­on in this city will ever decrease. The average number of permits issued monthly for crews to tear up sidewalks and streets to install or service undergroun­d cables, gas lines and watermains has increased by 12 per cent this year. This past weekend, the city was reporting 614 road restrictio­ns due to constructi­on, with 166 of them classified as major restrictio­ns.

And residentia­l condo constructi­on will continue to impact streets and sidewalks.

Over the next couple of weeks, community councils at Toronto city hall will consider approving six new proposals for constructi­on staging areas for residentia­l developmen­t, with lane and sidewalk closures lasting anywhere from six months to 39 months.

These closures can represent a bit of a windfall for city hall. The city expects to receive an average of about $15,700 per month in road occupancy permit fees from these six constructi­on projects, if their staging plans are approved. One project alone — a proposal to build an eight-storey retirement home on Laird Drive in North York, which will close a sidewalk for more than three years — is expected to bring in $745,061 in fees paid to the city.

But that money doesn’t do anything to ease the frustratio­n — and sometimes danger — I feel when I run into an obstructed sidewalk. So here are some ideas.

First, step up inspection­s. The city makes applicants provide detailed plans for sidewalk and road closures, but the reality on the street often doesn’t reflect those plans. Get tough and issue big fines for behaviour that runs contrary to the city’s Vision Zero efforts to keep streets safe for vulnerable users. Publicize the results of inspection­s and details on any warnings or fines issued.

Second, require every constructi­on site to post prominent signage indicating easy ways for people to lodge complaints about unsafe sites. Don’t just tell us to call 311.

And third, you know those “Sidewalk Closed” signs? Ban them. I don’t accept that constructi­on sometimes requires outright blocking pedestrian­s. Detours are always a possibilit­y, even if it means commandeer­ing a car lane for a makeshift sidewalk. Safe passage for pedestrian­s should always be the priority, and it’s time to stop accepting excuses. We can build this city without building death traps.

 ?? R.J. JOHNSTON TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? It’s understood that constructi­on is an unavoidabl­e reality in Toronto, but the lack of care for safety at a lot of constructi­on sites makes getting around the city more frustratin­g and dangerous than it should be, Matt Elliott writes.
R.J. JOHNSTON TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO It’s understood that constructi­on is an unavoidabl­e reality in Toronto, but the lack of care for safety at a lot of constructi­on sites makes getting around the city more frustratin­g and dangerous than it should be, Matt Elliott writes.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada