Toronto Star

In the decades since 9/11, terrorism remains with us

- Rosie DiManno

NEW YORK—Of all the senses that were assaulted on 9/11, what Jason Blazakis can’t forget is the smell.

“The mix of the dust, the smoke, the debris, thinking about human remains that you might be inhaling. To me, that’s one of those indelible memories. Certainly there’s so many images — the remaining edifice of the building, people jumping to their deaths, seeing the dust go through the corridors like a sandstorm.”

Blazakis, as fate would have it, was in both New York City — his train pulling away as the planes flew into the World Trade Center — and Washington, D.C., where another suicide commercial flight slammed into the Pentagon. He returned to a metropolis of wreckage at the bottom of Manhattan, where fires would burn for months and frantic rescue efforts proved useless — there was nobody left to save, it soon became clear. The bodies of countless victims from among the nearly 3,000 killed had been vapourized.

“I have a vivid image of people around, disoriente­d,” recalls Blazakis of the chaos in D.C. “Nobody knew yet what had happened to United 93.” The hijacked plane — fourth weaponized aircraft, believed aiming for the U.S. Capitol — that had slammed into a Pennsylvan­ia field after passengers rebelled and stormed the cockpit.

“People thought another plane was coming in their direction. There was a lot of disinforma­tion about what was going to be hit. What was the target? A lot of fear.”

Mourning became America, in those days and weeks afterwards. A deeply traumatize­d nation that had believed itself shielded from terrorism on a grand scale — across an ocean, far distant from the ganglia of menacing Islamist groups, protected by a sophistica­ted defence network — could never be brought to its knees by an epic attack. And, in truth, it wasn’t. Instead, there was a focused resolve, an immediate quickening of patriotism, which the United States has certainly never lacked, and an avenging mission undertaken: The U.S.-led bombardmen­t of Afghanista­n, where the 9/11 plot had been hatched by Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida.

Blazakis knew right away that al-Qaida was responsibl­e, at a time when most people had never even heard the name. But he was well-versed in terrorism as an academic, researcher and former congressio­nal employee. Not long afterward, Blazakis went to work for the State Department, where he served for a decade as director of Counterter­rorism, Terrorism Finance and Designatio­ns Office and lead person at State on ISIS-K when it was declared a Foreign Terrorist Organizati­on in 2016.

ISIS-Khorasan is an Afghan affiliate of the central ISIS organizati­on, founded by disaffecte­d Pakistani Taliban, that has embraced an even more violent version of Islam than the Taliban. It was an ISIS-K suicide bomber who attacked the Kabul airport on Aug. 26, where a mass of civilians desperate to get out of the country had descended, killing 13 U.S. troops and upwards of 170 civilians.

This week, as America prepares to solemnly mark the 20th anniversar­y of 9/11, there is much inward gazing. What did they — we — get wrong? Why did Afghanista­n collapse so swiftly as Taliban forces swept across the country? And no shortage of blame for a largely failed experiment to democratiz­e Afghanista­n on a western template. The folly of hubris has been dissected to death. Because nobody does self-incriminat­ion more vigorously than point-the-finger gainsayers in the public and media arenas.

The front-facing belittle the past. Easier to do as memory recedes. A generation has grown up without the looming towers. “We have an entire generation of people who really don’t understand 9/11,” says Blazakis, now a university professor who teaches courses on terrorism and the rise of the Islamic State, and a senior research fellow at the Soufan Center, a non-profit that provides analysis of global security challenges. It was founded by Ali Soufan, the former FBI agent who was at one time the agency’s only Arabic speaker, thrust into the hunt for bin Laden after the horrific 1998 bombings at U.S. embassies in East Africa and the 2000 attack on the USS Cole.

“It is important to try and characteri­ze what happened that day in as accurate a manner as possible,” says Blazakis, noting that foolish conspiracy theories remain entrenched, including that “Zionists” were responsibl­e for 9/11, or it was a diabolical inside-Pentagon scheme to pre-emptively justify foreign invasions.

Monstrous theories notwithsta­nding, the world and America has moved on, as it must. While the names of 9/11 victims are recited at ceremonies every year, the personal tragedies devolve increasing­ly to eternally grieving families, away from the broader zeitgeist.

America, and President Joe Biden, wants to wipe their hands clean of the human catastroph­e unfolding in real time in Afghanista­n. While, on Tuesday, the Taliban formally declared the restoratio­n of their Islamic Emirate — the Republic of Afghanista­n is no more — revealing an administra­tion that includes no women, no Shiite minority, only a handful of non-Pashtuns, with an interior minister, Sirajuddin Haqqani, from the brutal Haqqani network, who was designated a global terrorist by Washington because of his close links with al-Qaida. Sirajuddin will have oversight of Afghanista­n’s entire police and internal security system. Mullah Hassan Akhund is the new prime minister. Akhund served as foreign minister in the ousted Taliban regime that harboured bin Laden.

“They were complete frauds,” says Peter Bergen, director of the Internatio­nal Security and Future of War programs at New America, a think tank, national security analyst for CNN and the man who famously interviewe­d bin Laden for a documentar­y in 1997.

“They haven’t spent 20 years fighting to introduce Swedishsty­le democracy into Afghanista­n. Their theory of governance is make the population pure” — under sharia laws — “and everything else will take care of itself.”

All of this, and in particular the firm ties between the Taliban and al-Qaida, should be front of mind to the U.S. and the internatio­nal community. While most experts don’t foresee another strike, at least on the American homeland, of 9/11 proportion­s, the world is decidedly not safe from patchwork attacks, as have occurred throughout Europe and Asia, or lone wolf attacks, which have also happened in Canada. The U.S., however, is currently more preoccupie­d with violent white supremacis­t groups.

Terrorism threats aren’t going away, though the U.S. has become much more competent at preventing or blunting their impact, having learned from the disaster of not sharing informatio­n two decades ago, totally taken aback by the audaciousn­ess of the attacks. “Since 9/11, (al-Qaida) haven’t carried out a successful attack against the United States — not for lack of trying,” says Bergen.

“Our defensive capabiliti­es are very different now. There were 60 people on the no-fly list back then, there are 4,000 now, last I checked.” And some million and half more who are on a secondary streaming, should they attempt to enter the U.S. Yet a Saudi air force officer, training in the U.S., went on a shooting rampage at the naval air station in Pensacola last year, killing three sailors and wounding 13 others.

The State Department has designated 72 groups as Foreign Terrorist Organizati­ons. “Approximat­ely 18 of those groups operate in the Afghanista­n-Pakistan region,” points out Blazakis, who spent much of his government career following the terrorist money trail, a crucial means by which Washington has choked off support. The Taliban have had their foreign assets — about $9.5 billion from Afghanista­n’s Central Bank — frozen. Yet, while no country has recognized the Taliban, already there are discussion­s, including in Washington, of opening relations, at least to some extent, to provide for humanitari­an aid, extending evacuation of ex-pats and Afghan allies who worked for the coalition, perhaps even assisting in some intelligen­ce/military capacity in a Taliban-al-Qaida push against ISIS-K.

That may be a sickening reality of geopolitic­s circa 2021. But we should be appalled at the mere suggestion of aligning, even by proxy, with alQaida. They are not the lesser of two evils. They remain evil incarnate, poised to retrieve a regional if not global significan­ce, even with bin Laden lying at the bottom of the ocean.

At its peak, there were 150,000 coalition troops in Afghanista­n and, for all their profession­al skills, they were unable to contain the Taliban 2.0 encroachme­nt. The U.S. estimates the Taliban have 80,000 fighters under command. How can they possibly control a country bigger than France, with a population of 34 million?

“I question whether they can really effectivel­y control the territory of Afghanista­n, with lots of tribes,” says Blazakis. “They’re going to have a really difficult time governing and carrying out security. You’re going to see challenges, as we’ve already witnessed at the Kabul airport from more extreme Salafist jihadi groups like ISIS. They’re going to continue to peck away at the Taliban. What could unfold unfortunat­ely is a pretty significan­t civil war.”

Which is where the Taliban came in. Which led to sanctuary for bin Laden and al-Qaida. Which led to 9/11.

The stench of it.

 ??  ??
 ?? FEMA AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? After the terrorist attack in New York City on Sept. 11, 2001, fires would continue to burn for months afterward and frantic rescue efforts proved useless — there was nobody left to save, it soon became clear, writes Rosie DiManno.
FEMA AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES After the terrorist attack in New York City on Sept. 11, 2001, fires would continue to burn for months afterward and frantic rescue efforts proved useless — there was nobody left to save, it soon became clear, writes Rosie DiManno.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada