Toronto Star

Are your face masks still effective as COVID-19 lingers?

Experts say usefulness of facial coverings depends on the type


Although being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 dramatical­ly reduces your chances of becoming hospitaliz­ed and dying from the disease, the shots don’t entirely eliminate risks of infection.

That’s why health experts have continued to urge people to practise other preventati­ve measures, including wearing masks to benefit from an additional layer of protection during the pandemic.

But more than a year and a half later, what more have scientists learned about masks’ ability to curb coronaviru­s spread? And are the mask types health officials first recommende­d still effective as more dangerous variants emerge?

Mask guidance from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention went down a shaky road earlier this year when officials announced fully vaccinated people could ditch their masks under all scenarios, then took it back and said they should wear masks indoors in public in areas of “substantia­l or high transmissi­on.” The CDC updated its recommenda­tions following surges of coronaviru­s cases caused by the Delta variant.

Unvaccinat­ed people and vaccinated people who are immunocomp­romised should continue to wear well-fitted masks indoors in public. Masks are generally not necessary outdoors, except for areas with high numbers of COVID-19 cases.

Generally, the CDC says masks should have two or more layers of “washable, breathable fabric” that completely covers your nose and mouth. It should “fit snugly against the sides of your face” with no gaps and have a wire that bends over your nose to prevent air leakage out the top.

This criteria can include cloth masks, surgical masks, homemade ones and those with clear plastic panels to facilitate easy communicat­ion. The CDC says you should avoid masks made of fabric that makes it hard to breathe, that have exhalation valves or vents, and N95s labelled as “surgical” or “medical” masks to prioritize them for health-care workers.

Proceed with caution with homemade and cloth masks

If you decide to keep wearing your multi-layer homemade or cloth mask, experts advise washing them every day. But proceed with caution.

A study published in July 2020 found that respirator­y droplets travelled about 2.5 inches after passing through a homemade cloth mask, about eight inches with a cone-style disposable mask and a little over a foot with a folded handkerchi­ef in a lab setting.

But with a bandana, cough droplets travelled about three feet, seven inches — the worst of them all aside from no mask — even though the material had the highest thread count compared with the other coverings.

There are two tests that infectious disease specialist Dr. Roy Chemaly of the MD Anderson Cancer Centre in Texas calls “flow and glow” to gauge the quality of your mask.

One is to hold a lit match or candle about six inches in front of your face while wearing your mask and try to blow it out. If the flame goes out, you may need to upgrade your mask. The other test is to hold your mask up to a bright light; if you see through it, your mask may not be thick enough to block respirator­y droplets from other potentiall­y sick people.

A study published in September of nearly 350,000 people in rural Bangladesh found that villages assigned to wear surgical masks were about 11 per cent less likely than villages wearing no masks to develop COVID-19 over eight weeks.

Protection increased to 35 per cent for people over 60 years old.

Villages wearing cloth masks did see fewer COVID-19 cases compared with villages sporting no masks, but the Stanford and Yale University researcher­s said “the difference was not statistica­lly significan­t,” aligning with studies that show surgical masks can better filter germs. Cloth masks did, however, reduce the likelihood of Bangladesh residents experienci­ng coronaviru­s symptoms while infected.

“Our study provides strong evidence that mask wearing can interrupt the transmissi­on of (the coronaviru­s). It also suggests that filtration efficiency is important,” study co-author Dr. Stephen Luby, a professor of medicine at Stanford, said in a statement.

“This includes the fit of the mask as well as the materials from which it is made. A cloth mask is certainly better than nothing. But now might be a good time to consider upgrading to a surgical mask.”

It’s important to note surgical masks are not designed to be reused. The U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion says if they are “damaged or soiled, or if breathing through the mask becomes difficult, you should remove it, discard it safely and replace it with a new one.”

Surgical masks can also lose their effectiven­ess over time. A study published in July 2020 found that people who mildly cough could still expel droplets up to three feet from their mouth while wearing a surgical mask because pressure builds inside.

Should you double mask?

When the Delta variant began dominating all other versions of the coronaviru­s in the U.S., some health experts were suggesting people wear two masks: a cloth mask over a surgical one. The CDC never officially mandated double masks, but the agency did include it in updated recommenda­tions.

A CDC study published in February found that wearing a cloth mask over a surgical mask — as well as modifying a surgical mask by knotting its ear loops — reduced a healthy person’s risk of catching coronaviru­s by more than 95 per cent.

Some experts have said it doesn’t hurt to wear two masks, but as long as your single homemade, cloth or surgical mask fits the criteria laid out by the CDC, you should benefit from some protection against coronaviru­s infection.

 ?? DANIEL SLIM AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES FILE PHOTO ?? A new study found mask wearing can interrupt the transmissi­on of COVID-19 and suggests the filtration efficiency is important, co-author Dr. Stephen Luby said in a statement.
DANIEL SLIM AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES FILE PHOTO A new study found mask wearing can interrupt the transmissi­on of COVID-19 and suggests the filtration efficiency is important, co-author Dr. Stephen Luby said in a statement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada