Toronto Star

U.S. to provide humanitari­an aid to Afghanista­n

But Washington refuses to recognize Taliban as country’s political rulers

- KATHY GANNON

ISLAMABAD—The U.S. has agreed to provide humanitari­an aid to a desperatel­y poor Afghanista­n on the brink of an economic disaster, while refusing to give political recognitio­n to the country’s new Taliban rulers, the Taliban said Sunday.

The statement came at the end of the first direct talks between the former foes since the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops at the end of August.

The U.S. statement was less definitive, saying only that the two sides “discussed the United States’ provision of robust humanitari­an assistance, directly to the Afghan people.”

The Taliban said the talks held in Doha, Qatar, “went well,” with Washington freeing up humanitari­an aid to Afghanista­n after agreeing not to link such assistance to formal recognitio­n of the Taliban.

The United States made it clear that the talks were in no way a preamble to recognitio­n of the Taliban, who swept into power Aug. 15 after the U.S.-allied government collapsed.

State Department spokespers­on Ned Price called the discussion­s “candid and profession­al,” with the U.S. side reiteratin­g that the Taliban will be judged on their actions, not only their words.

“The U.S. delegation focused on security and terrorism concerns and safe passage for U.S. citizens, other foreign nationals and our Afghan partners, as well as on human rights, including the meaningful participat­ion of women and girls in all aspects of Afghan society,” he said in a statement.

Taliban political spokespers­on Suhail Shaheen also told the Associated Press that the movement’s interim foreign minister assured the U.S. during the talks that the Taliban are committed to seeing that Afghan soil is not used by extremists to launch attacks against other countries.

On Saturday, however, the Taliban ruled out co-operation with Washington on containing the increasing­ly active Islamic State group in Afghanista­n.

IS, an enemy of the Taliban, has claimed responsibi­lity for a number of recent attacks, including Friday’s suicide bombing that killed 46 minority Shiite Muslims. Washington considers IS its greatest terrorist threat emanating from Afghanista­n.

“We are able to tackle Daesh independen­tly,” Shaheen said when asked whether the Taliban would work with the U.S. to contain the Islamic State affiliate. He used an Arabic acronym for IS.

Bill Roggio, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracie­s who tracks militant groups, agreed the Taliban do not need Washington’s help to hunt down and destroy Afghanista­n’s IS affiliate, known as the Islamic State in Khorasan Province, or ISKP.

The Taliban “fought 20 years to eject the U.S., and the last thing it needs is the return of the U.S. It also doesn’t need U.S. help,” said Roggio, who also produces the foundation’s Long War Journal.

The IS affiliate doesn’t have the advantage of safe havens in Pakistan and Iran that the Taliban had in its fight against the United States, Roggio said. However, he warned that the Taliban’s longtime support for al-Qaida make them unreliable as counterter­rorism partners with the United States.

During the meeting, U.S. officials were expected to press the Taliban to allow Americans and others to leave Afghanista­n. In their statement, the Taliban said without elaboratin­g that they would “facilitate principled movement of foreign nationals.”

 ?? BULENT KILIC AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES FILE PHOTO ?? Afghans carry belongings across the Afghanista­n border to Pakistan at Spin Boldak in September. The U.S. and the Taliban have held their first direct talks since U.S. troops withdrew in August.
BULENT KILIC AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES FILE PHOTO Afghans carry belongings across the Afghanista­n border to Pakistan at Spin Boldak in September. The U.S. and the Taliban have held their first direct talks since U.S. troops withdrew in August.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada