Toronto Star

Bezos chasing the final frontier

Blasting Shatner into orbit the latest step in billionair­e space race

- JOHN HERRMAN

On Wednesday morning, William Shatner, best known for his role as the “Star Trek” franchise’s original Captain Kirk, will take a seat atop the New Shepard suborbital launch vehicle, built by Blue Origin, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos’s space concern.

From a West Texas launch pad, he will ascend approximat­ely 100 kilometres before the passenger capsule will separate from the rocket and both will return home.

Shatner’s itinerary includes four minutes floating in microgravi­ty.

“‘Yes, it’s true; I’m going to be a ‘rocket man!’ ” Shatner wrote on Twitter last week. “I’ve heard about space for a long time now,” he quipped in a statement released by Blue Origin. “I’m taking the opportunit­y to see it for myself. What a miracle.”

Weather permitting, the man behind one of the most recognizab­le spacefarin­g characters in science fiction history will become the oldest person ever to float there. In doing so, he’ll be making a cameo in a differ- ent sort of media franchise — one which, despite its rich premise and lavish funding, is still trying to decide on its tone, stakes and overall narrative direction. The billionair­e space race is happening, whether we choose to pay attention or not. Of course, the billionair­es would prefer that we did.

Your feelings about the billionair­e space race aren’t likely to stray far from your gut feeling about those three words in that particular order.

At one end: these are some of the greatest entreprene­urs of their generation­s meeting an even greater challenge, directing their considerab­le wealth and talents to the advancemen­t of the human race. At the other: some of Earth’s most prolific pillagers are burning ill-gotten gains as fuel to fulfil their boyhood fantasies while the planet collapses beneath them.

The vast majority of regular people may not have strong feelings about the billionair­es going to space, judging what’s happening as perhaps cool, strange, fascinatin­g, either broadly hopeful or unnecessar­y but, most of all, as currently somewhat peripheral to their lives. A July poll conducted by public relations professor Joseph Cabosky with the Harris Group found, in Cabosky’s summary, that “people were supportive of space travel and the technologi­cal developmen­ts that come from it. Yet respondent­s also viewed these events as ego trips generally limited to rich people.”

The associatio­n of space with famous billionair­es also flattens out difference­s between the new space ventures and the people who run them. SpaceX is a mature business, the largest launch provider and commercial satellite operator in the world, a major NASA contractor that can also claim dozens of major aerospace breakthrou­ghs as its own and a significan­t source of its founder’s wealth. Blue Origin, whose founder trades places with SpaceX’s as the richest person in the world, is ambitious but clearly playing catch-up, while Richard Branson, who founded Virgin Galactic in 2004 and whose fortune is comparativ­ely minuscule, has focused on suborbital space tourism and seems, well, happy to be included.

The original space race was different. A direct extension of an arms and propaganda race between two competing superpower­s — each representi­ng one of the century’s defining ideologies, under the spectre of annihilati­on — the space race of the 1950s and ’60s was inseparabl­e from the most salient stories of its time.

Its firsts were clear and unconditio­nal, like summited peaks: first satellite in orbit; first animal; first human; the moon. If you’re old enough to have been able to form memories in 1957, there’s a good chance you remember looking for Sputnik as it crossed the night sky. An estimated 94 per cent of TV-owning Americans and hundreds of millions of people around the globe tuned in to watch Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon in 1969.

The billionair­e space race has been able to tap into the nostalgia and yearning for Space Age ideals of exploratio­n and daring but has done so under the auspices of, basically, a set of competing marketing campaigns fighting to drown each other out.

Elon Musk, the rare sort of billionair­e who has multiple fandoms, has proved an able promoter for SpaceX, and some of its launches have made for tense internatio­nal viewing events and memorable spectacles. (Somewhere out there, you may remember, a Tesla with a mannequin is orbiting the sun.)

In September, the company sent a civilian crew into orbit, asserting SpaceX’s status as the clear current leader in both technologi­cal and public relations terms. (The civilians were selected in collaborat­ion with a military contractor and payments processing billionair­e through a hybrid sweepstake­s/ children’s hospital fundraiser/ “Shark Tank”-style process that was filmed for a Netflix docuseries.)

Branson and Bezos have made the billionair­e space race more literal and personal and often speak in dreamier language. Branson launched first, in July, and Bezos followed days later. Speaking “to all the kids down there” from the edge of space, Branson said, “If we can do this, just imagine what you can do.”

Bezos, after landing, said simply, “Best day ever!”

In all of these excursions, there has been an overt or implicit message: that the billionair­e space is about opening up space flight — or, sometimes, “tourism” — to wider groups of people. You can reserve tickets to space already and a few people have now been able to use them.

The techno-optimism of that idea — that some of today’s toys for the wealthy will one day be taken for granted by millions — is not without precedent. But it’s also recognizab­ly a product pitch as well as an insistent attempt to assure the public that things aren’t just what they look like today, which is the ultrarich selling flights to space to the slightly less rich. Appeals that the private space industry of the United States is the country’s best hedge against growing space programs in other countries double, even for those who find them persuasive, as sour reminders of general national institutio­nal decline.

In these early stages, the billionair­es’ pitches about their roles in space are still constantly adjusting, never quite aligning even when they overlap. Sometimes they’re running companies developing lines of business. Sometimes they’re enjoying some jocular teasing with a few of their peers. Their messaging pulls in history and tropes, science and fiction, nostalgia and wild speculatio­n. Space is a refuge, a frontier or an untapped market; Earth must be saved, or escaped, or writ large across the cosmos.

In a conference last year, Musk summarized one of his longtime pitches: “If there’s something terrible that happens on Earth, either made by humans or natural, we want to have, like, life insurance for life as a whole. Then, there’s the kind of excitement and adventure.”

After returning to the surface of the planet in July, Bezos said in an interview that it was his hope to “move all heavy industry and all polluting industry off of Earth and operate it in space.” Eventually, he has argued, “we could have a trillion humans in the solar system and it still wouldn’t be crowded” — a vision that would include, he suggested, “a thousand Einsteins and a thousand Mozarts.”

One could imagine a head of state speaking in such terms — and with the presumptio­n of being able to speak for the public — as many have, albeit steadily less persuasive­ly since John F. Kennedy talked about doing things because they are hard. (President Barack Obama: “Getting to Mars will require continued co-operation between government and private innovators.” President Donald Trump: “I am updating my budget to include an additional $1.6 billion so that we can return to Space in a BIG WAY!”)

But Musk, Branson and Bezos are first and foremost understood as businesspe­ople and they are, in fact, running businesses. The stories of their companies are told in speeches and interviews, sure, but also through marketing and PR, in presentati­ons to investors and appeals to regulators, in responses to complaints and concerns raised by employees, in multiplyin­g and criss-crossing lawsuits and, occasional­ly, on Twitter, where planetary banalities intrude constantly.

Bezos’s articulate­d dreams of infinite growth in space are brought back to Earth, fairly or not, by the resemblanc­e they bear to the ambitions he has described and achieved here, and what they have meant for the rest of us in practice. When Blue Origin subtweets Branson by noting, just before Branson’s successful flight, that actually, “space begins 100 km up at the internatio­nally recognized Kármán line” and that none of their astronauts will “have an asterisk next to their name” — or when Musk says Bezos should “put more of his energy into getting to orbit than lawsuits,” in reference to a squabble over a NASA contract for a lunar lander — it’s hard not to be reminded how much they’ve thrived and profited within the earthly morass from which they claim they will one day free us.

The story of the new space race will change with its progress, adjusting as it encounters or breaks through new limits. Indeed, these firms are charting humankind’s path back into space, and even insightful critics have tended and will continue to underestim­ate their straightfo­rward capabiliti­es.

Still, for now, the story of the billionair­e space race looks an awful lot like just that: billionair­es racing each other to space. Perhaps the most pervasive suspicion about the new space barons is that, whatever else they’re up to and wherever this goes, this whole exercise is, at its core, between them; it’s about their childhood dreams, their egos, their legacies, their comparativ­e fortunes. Our understand­ing of the future they describe depends, like our lives on Earth, on what little we can understand about the motivation­s of a few people.

This is also, of course, the realm of phallus-shaped rocket jokes and Dr. Evil memes, and why not? It’s low-orbiting fruit. I will enjoy watching Captain Kirk, a character written well before I was born and with whom I grew up, touch the edge of space, appreciati­ng the gentle ironies of the USS Enterprise’s hard-charging captain getting same-day-shipped a few thousand yards into space by the Amazon guy. I suspect plenty of people who haven’t been paying attention to what that Amazon guy has been up to in space will get a kick out of this, too.

Blue Origin told the New York Times that Shatner would be flying “as our guest” — meaning he didn’t pay for his ticket. Maybe Bezos wants to help humanity to boldly go where no man has before, together. Maybe he just thinks this is all so, so cool. In the billionair­e space race, it’s none of our business. It’s theirs.

“I’ve heard about space for a long time now. I’m taking the opportunit­y to see it for myself.”

WILLIAM SHATNER

 ?? JOE RAEDLE GETTY IMAGES VIA TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE FILE PHOTO ?? Blue Origin’s New Shepard lifts off from a launch pad in Van Horn, Texas, carrying Jeff Bezos along with his brother Mark Bezos, 18-year-old Oliver Daemen and 82-year-old Wally Funk in July.
JOE RAEDLE GETTY IMAGES VIA TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE FILE PHOTO Blue Origin’s New Shepard lifts off from a launch pad in Van Horn, Texas, carrying Jeff Bezos along with his brother Mark Bezos, 18-year-old Oliver Daemen and 82-year-old Wally Funk in July.
 ?? REG INNELL TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? More than half a century after he started playing Captain James Kirk as part of the “Star Trek” franchise, William Shatner, now 90, is set to become the oldest person ever to visit space.
REG INNELL TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO More than half a century after he started playing Captain James Kirk as part of the “Star Trek” franchise, William Shatner, now 90, is set to become the oldest person ever to visit space.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada