Toronto Star

Help with bad condo tenants is on the way

- Bob Aaron Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer and a contributi­ng columnist for the Star. He can be reached at bob@aaron.ca or on Twitter: @bobaaron2

Condominiu­m owners who rent out their units without credit and reference checks run the risk of being financiall­y responsibl­e for their tenant’s misbehavio­ur.

Heidi Yee Hui owns a condominiu­m on Carlton St., in Toronto, which she leased out to a male tenant earlier this year. Soon after moving in, he began to engage in “bizarre and threatenin­g behaviour.” He took off his clothes in the common areas of the building, and performed what a court later called “lewd acts.” He also blocked the entrance to the building, not allowing other residents to enter.

Evidence produced at the hearing claimed he pulled a knife on a security guard, disturbed residents and carved his initials on some of the doors of condo units. He was arrested twice for his conduct in the building.

In June, Hui delivered an eviction notice to the problemati­c tenant, but the Landlord and Tenant Board denied her request for an expedited hearing. At the end of August, the condominiu­m corporatio­n brought a court applicatio­n for an order requiring the tenant to observe the building’s rules, and the owner to take all reasonable steps to ensure that her tenant complied. The owner co-operated with the condominiu­m’s court applicatio­n, but the tenant did not attend the court hearing.

Justice William Chalmers issued an order requiring the tenant to cease engaging in any threatenin­g, abusive, intimidati­ng and harassing behaviour. The judge could not order the tenant evicted because that is under the exclusive jurisdicti­on of the Landlord and Tenant Board.

Unfortunat­ely, the unit owner got hit with $10,000 in court costs even though she had cooperated with the condominiu­m’s court applicatio­n. The judge noted that the other unit owners should not have to pay for the legal costs of the proceeding against Hui’s tenant.

The Hui case reminds me of a 2019 court ruling involving a condominiu­m building on Weston Rd., and Harbans Kaur Sandhu, a unit owner. When her tenant pursued an unsuccessf­ul lawsuit against the condominiu­m corporatio­n, the judge ordered the $86,000 court costs to be added to the owner’s common expenses.

The good news for landlords, condominiu­m corporatio­ns and law-abiding tenants is that as of Jan. 1, 2022 several changes to the Condominiu­m Act will come into force. These include that the Condominiu­m

Authority Tribunal will more quickly — and less expensivel­y — hear disputes, such as the claim against Hui and her tenant.

Changes to the legislatio­n will prohibit a person from:

Doing, or not doing, anything likely to damage condo property or cause injury or illness to an individual.

Carrying on or permitting activities in a condo corporatio­n if they result in the creation or continuati­on of any unreasonab­le noise that is a nuisance, annoyance or disruption.

Legislativ­e amendments will set out a list of prescribed nuisances, annoyances or disruption­s which will include unreasonab­le odour, smoke, vapour, light and vibration.

The Condominiu­m Authority will also have the power to enforce provisions in a condominiu­m’s declaratio­n or bylaws governing indemnific­ation of owners or the corporatio­n involved in these types of disputes. It’s a big step forward in consumer protection.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? Condo owners run the risk of being financiall­y responsibl­e for a tenant’s misbehavio­ur, Bob Aaron writes.
DREAMSTIME Condo owners run the risk of being financiall­y responsibl­e for a tenant’s misbehavio­ur, Bob Aaron writes.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada