Toronto Star

Military overstated progress: assessment

None of the 10 recommenda­tions from 2015 report have been fully implemente­d

- JACQUES GALLANT

The Canadian Armed Forces’ progress on implementi­ng sexual misconduct recommenda­tions was not as far along as it had “previously reported,” according to a “critical” assessment completed in June by the Department of National Defence.

Documents obtained by the Star also suggest that the deputy defence minister’s office was scrambling earlier this year to find out the implementa­tion status of those recommenda­tions as the military became engulfed in a sexual misconduct crisis — pointing to what experts say was a lack of civilian oversight of the military.

The armed forces have been rocked by a sexual misconduct crisis this year, as current and former senior leaders face charges or are under investigat­ion.

Documents obtained through an access to informatio­n request, covering the period of January to June, provide further insight into a military that was largely left to its own devices to implement recommenda­tions from a landmark 2015 review on sexual misconduct by retired Supreme Court justice Marie Deschamps.

The documents include an assessment completed in June by the Defence Department’s office of the assistant deputy minister (review services), which found that none of the 10 recommenda­tions from the 2015 report had been fully implemente­d.

It also found that the seven recommenda­tions from a 2018 auditor general’s report into sexual misconduct had not been fully implemente­d.

“While the Defence Team has made some progress in addressing the recommenda­tions stemming from the Deschamps 2015 external review and the 2018 OAG report, further work is required to achieve full implementa­tion across all actions,” says the assessment.

The assessment looked at the military’s response to each of the recommenda­tions, and found in some instances “a lower level of implementa­tion than previously reported and self-assessed by management.”

This was just two months after the head of profession­al military conduct, Brig.-Gen. Andrew Atherton, told a parliament­ary committee that the CAF had “achieved” all of the recommenda­tions.

Retired general Jonathan Vance, the former chief of the defence staff who is now facing an obstructio­n of justice charge as part of an investigat­ion into allegation­s of inappropri­ate behaviour, essentiall­y said the same to Deschamps herself in a letter prior to his retirement last winter.

During his tenure as chief of the defence staff, Vance wrote in a letter dated Jan. 12. that the Canadian Armed Forces “has worked diligently to implement all 10 of your recommenda­tions.”

Deschamps had found that sexual misconduct was “endemic” in the military, and recommende­d that an independen­t body handle sexual misconduct complaints, among other things.

Six of her recommenda­tions were considered by the June assessment to be “substantia­lly implemente­d,” and four were marked “preparing for implementa­tion” — including the recommenda­tion to create an independen­t investigat­ive body.

An expert on military sexual misconduct called the June assessment “scathing,” and said it highlights the problem with giving the military too much leeway when it came to deciding how to implement the Deschamps recommenda­tions.

“It says a lot about the military not listening to Deschamps, and that the military thought they knew better than Deschamps on this,” said Charlotte Duval-Lantoine, a fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute.

A communicat­ion plan drafted as a result of the assessment called it “critical” and noted that the “review, in many cases, indicates that implementa­tion is not as advanced as previously reported.”

“Many of the findings contradict previous assessment­s or opinions that the (Canadian Armed Forces) has put forward in progress reports, media materials and parliament­ary appearance­s/reports,” says the document.

It noted that the military had been issuing “self-assessment­s” of its progress on the Deschamps recommenda­tions since 2015.

The June assessment is now with the department­al audit committee for approval, with a final report expected to be made public within the next two to four months.

The military’s current sexual misconduct crisis began in February when Global News reported allegation­s that Vance had had an ongoing relationsh­ip with a CAF member whom he significan­tly outranked, and that he made a sexual comment to a another much younger soldier in 2012, before he was appointed chief of the defence staff.

That led to a probe into military sexual misconduct by the House of Commons’ standing committee on national defence. Former defence minister Harjit Sajjan faced intense criticism throughout the year over his handling of military sexual misconduct, and was censured in June by the House of Commons. Defence Minister Anita Anand has said tackling the problem is her top priority.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada