Toronto Star

NO Billions of dollars could be better spent

- BIANCA MUGYENYI BIANCA MUGYENYI IS DIRECTOR OF THE CANADIAN FOREIGN POLICY INSTITUTE.

Those who profit from war and weapons sales want us to believe our security is dependent on increased military spending. But, for most Canadians, the opposite is true. In addition to a pandemic, our security threats are ecological, social and economic and expanding the largest federal government ministry cannot protect us from these crises.

Canada’s Armed Forces have 125,000 soldiers, reservists and other staff. The military manages the “largest infrastruc­ture portfolio in the federal government,” covering a land mass equal to half of Switzerlan­d.

From chemical waste to bomb ordnance, its operations have scarred landscapes across the country. While little discussed, the Department of National Defence is also responsibl­e for a staggering 59 per cent of federal government greenhouse gas emissions.

The environmen­tally damaging Armed Forces receive 15 times the public resources allocated to Environmen­t and Climate Change Canada. On the world stage, Canada accounts for 1.1 per cent of internatio­nal military spending, despite having less than 0.5 per cent of the global population. There are only 12 countries that spend more on their militaries than Canada.

In the two largest-ever federal government procuremen­ts, Ottawa plans to spend a combined $100 billion — $350 billion over their life cycle — on 88 new fighter jets and 15 surface combatant vessels. The warplanes will carry 18,000 pounds of destructiv­e ordnance. The warships will allow U.S. officials to launch “Canadian” missiles.

Canada’s naval vessels are militarizi­ng the seas. Last week, a Canadian naval vessel was dispatched to the Black Sea, which borders Russia. Provocativ­ely, Canadian frigates have recently joined U.S. warships passing through the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait. Canadian warships patrol the North Sea, Mediterran­ean and Caribbean.

To assist Canada’s global maritime force, small bases have been establishe­d in Kuwait, Jamaica and Senegal. Ottawa has also been negotiatin­g to set up four more “lily pads” in Singapore, Germany, Tanzania and South Korea as part of an effort to “project combat power” under the Pentagon’s direction.

Canadian forces are currently participat­ing in some two dozen internatio­nal missions. Hundreds of Canadian troops are in Iraq as well as in Latvia and Ukraine, both of which border Russia. Smaller numbers assist a Palestinia­n security force that helps enforce Israel’s occupation of the West Bank.

Let’s not forget that over the past three decades, tens of thousands of Canadians were deployed to fight in Iraq, Serbia, Afghanista­n and Libya. What good came of those wars? Thirty years later, fighting continues in Iraq, while ethnic tensions simmer in Kosovo. The 2011 NATO bombing of Libya led to slave markets and an ongoing civil war. In Afghanista­n, the dominant Taliban appears moderate compared to ISIS-K.

Canadian forces have also caused major harm in places while barely firing a shot. In 2004, 30 Canadian JTF 2 commandos “secured” the Port-au-Prince airport the night U.S. Marines exiled Haiti’s elected leftist President JeanBertra­nd Aristide to the Central African Republic. Following this, 500 Canadian troops protected Haiti’s foreign-installed government for six months as it suppressed the democracy movement.

Six years later, when a devastatin­g earthquake killed tens of thousands, Canada did not send its Heavy Urban Search and Rescue Teams. Instead, they dispatched 2,000 troops to Haiti, which largely policed a traumatize­d population. Internal government documents revealed Ottawa feared that a postearthq­uake power vacuum could lead to a “popular uprising.” A “secret” briefing noted, “Political fragility has increased the risks of a popular uprising and has fed the rumour that ex-president Jean-Bertrand Aristide, currently in exile in South Africa, wants to organize a return to power.”

Canada’s military isn’t designed to defend against a foreign aggressor, let alone protect citizens from pressing security concerns like a life-altering pandemic or ever-worsening climate breakdown. It is structured to aid U.S. military aims.

Few nations possess naval vessels capable of launching missiles 1,700 km. Canada’s Five Eyes counterpar­t New Zealand, North America trade partner Mexico and European ally Ireland don’t have operationa­l fighter jets. Thirty countries, including Costa Rica, Panama and Iceland, have no military at all.

Let’s get our priorities straight. We need less, not more, spending on Canada’s military.

 ?? ??
 ?? CHLOE CUSHMAN ILLUSTRATI­ON ??
CHLOE CUSHMAN ILLUSTRATI­ON

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada