Toronto Star

Auditor cites problems in infrastruc­ture program

Federal government not properly tracking results, leaving effect of $4.6-billion program unclear

- CHRISTOPHE­R REYNOLDS

Auditor general Karen Hogan says the federal government’s $4.6-billion program to bolster transporta­tion infrastruc­ture across the country suffers from poor results tracking, but the fund is well-crafted overall.

In a report Tuesday, Hogan said the Transport Department took an evidence-based approach to pinpoint supply-chain bottleneck­s and call for proposals under the National Trade Corridors Fund.

For example, backed-up terminals and overloaded warehouses during the past few years led officials to solicit submission­s for port upgrades and expansions.

However, half of the 181 funded projects failed to include a fleshedout strategy to assess results, leaving their impact unclear, according to the report. A handful had no strategy. “The department did not effectivel­y monitor and report on results,” the report stated.

Transport Canada needs sturdier monitoring and reporting systems, especially given how long infrastruc­ture programs can take to produce results, Hogan wrote.

“This time factor makes it all the more important to have a robust system to track performanc­e so that Transport Canada can show the extent to which the fund has contribute­d to improving the fluidity of Canada’s transporta­tion infrastruc­ture,” she said in a release.

The dearth of tracking also produced radio silence on how the program might back sustainabl­e developmen­t goals from the United Nations, Hogan added.

The government launched the National Trade Corridors Fund in 2017 in an effort to strengthen Canada’s network of roads, rails, airports and seaports by 2028. The projects by municipal and provincial government­s as well as private companies range from routine street upgrades to multibilli­on-dollar port terminals.

Industry has welcomed the money, but says the program falls far short of the funding tsunami unleashed in the United States as well as the kind of comprehens­ive strategy needed to address long-standing problems. Since 2021, the Biden administra­tion’s $1.2-trillion (U.S.) infrastruc­ture bill has funded some 40,000 projects aimed at rebuilding the U.S. transporta­tion network.

“There is no commensura­te kind of funding happening, particular­ly for marine infrastruc­ture, on our side,” said Jason Card, a spokespers­on for the Chamber of Marine Commerce.

“The dire consequenc­e of that is we’ll be falling behind in our carbon reduction goals, our supply-chain strength and our economic developmen­t goals, potentiall­y.”

Trade groups and analysts have also called for a more cohesive approach to the overall flow of goods into and out of the country.

The government launched a national infrastruc­ture assessment in 2021, but has yet to follow up on recommenda­tions — establishi­ng an independen­t commission on major infrastruc­ture opportunit­ies, for example — more than two and a half years later.

The United States, European Union, Australia and Switzerlan­d have overarchin­g transport infrastruc­ture strategies, the European Court of Auditors found in 2021. Canada does not.

The auditor general highlighte­d other defects in the trade corridors fund. The Transport Department weighed project proposals using a merit-based approach, “but could not demonstrat­e on what basis it prioritize­d some meritoriou­s projects over others,” the report found. Documents that laid out the benefit of various projects recommende­d by civil servants were “insufficie­nt” to support their ultimate ranking, it said.

Nonetheles­s, the auditor general’s office found no instance of funds handed over to ineligible recipients.

Half of the 181 funded projects failed to include a fleshed-out strategy to assess results, according to the audior general’s report. A handful had no strategy outlined at all

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada