Toronto Star

Ford’s hydro subsidy is counterpro­ductive

- MARTIN REGG COHN

Doug Ford’s Tories are spending more money than ever before in Ontario history.

So why isn’t there ever enough money to invest in health care and education?

Answer: The Ford government spends billions upon billions of dollars on an indefensib­ly wasteful, vote-buying subsidy for your monthly electricit­y bill.

You can look it up in last month’s budget: $7.3 billion annually to make your hydro bill magically shrink.

Such a massive appropriat­ion amounts to misappropr­iation. It would be scandalous if it weren’t so seductive.

It’s a sieve, but we’re all in on it. And we’re all cashing in on it.

My monthly bill from Toronto Hydro includes an indelible line announcing a gift from the premier to me personally: “Ontario Electricit­y Rebate.”

This month, there’s a $23.31 credit on that line, which reduces my total bill to $113.16 (after tax). Sweet. But bitterswee­t.

It’s an incentive for consumptio­n that is counterpro­ductive. The more electricit­y you burn, the more money you get back from the government as your reward for wasting energy.

Living the good life in a monster home? You’ve won the subsidy lottery from the Ontario government, month after month, no matter how wealthy and wasteful you are.

I never asked for this gift that keeps on giving. But many other Ontarians — and the politician­s who wanted their votes — insisted on it.

Remember “heat or eat?” The opposition made a meal of that hydro hyperbole.

In Kathleen Wynne’s waning days as premier, with public opinion turning against a dying Liberal dynasty, the clamour for relief from rising electricit­y bills forced her hand to launch a multibilli­on-dollar rebate. In opposition, the Progressiv­e Conservati­ves and New Democrats rode the wave of indignatio­n until the government of the day acquiesced.

In fact, electricit­y rates weren’t especially high in Ontario compared to most other jurisdicti­ons across North America — apart from those provinces blessed with abundant renewables we can’t compete with. But the perception of oppression could not be dialed down, the polarizati­on of our politics could not be reversed, and the governing Liberals could not avoid the path of least resistance on electricit­y.

Voters took the money, but not the bait. In the 2018 election, Wynne’s Liberals were still humiliated and Ford’s Tories rode to power on the strength of that hydro hysteria — until people forgot about it.

But the subsidy will not be our salvation. It is an illusion within a delusion, for it is utterly unaffordab­le.

Two years ago, “Electricit­y CostRelief Programs” amounted to a $5.8 billion budgetary expenditur­e. In the current fiscal year, that subsidy has jumped to $7.3 billion — an increase of 25 per cent in two years and climbing.

If we had the political courage and cognition to stop subsidizin­g consumptio­n, and start rewarding conservati­on, what could we do with that money?

We’ll spend more money reducing hydro bills this year than we do on the entire Ministry of Transporta­tion ($7.1 billion).

We’ll spend roughly the same amount on electricit­y credits than we allocated last year to long-term care ($7.75 billion).

At a time when the government is slowly starving our post-secondary system — funding will be reduced from $12.6 billion to $12.2 billion next year — imagine the impact of transferri­ng that $7.3-billion hydro subsidy to the 47 public colleges and universiti­es across Ontario, many of which are now in deficit.

Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfal­vy, who styles himself a prudent steward of Ontario’s treasury, likes to talk about the wastefulne­ss of interest payments on the rising provincial debt he inherited. And yet the annual hydro subsidy amounts to roughly half of the $14 billion he allocates for interest on our total debt of $439 billion.

In the six years since Ford took power, the price of power will have added a cumulative $41.2 billion to Ontario’s budgetary bill.

Why are we forcing taxpayers to subsidize ratepayers? Why are we rewarding consumptio­n and penalizing conservati­on?

Because politician­s think voters will buy what they’re selling — and subsidizin­g.

Except it didn’t work for Wynne. It won’t save Ford when his time is up. And it won’t help the rest of us when we ultimately have to pay up.

Yet the province has given up nearly $1 billion a year in foregone revenues for the licence plate giveaway. And it is throwing away another $1.2 billion annually by lowering the provincial gas tax.

Why do our politician­s persist in subsidizin­g air conditioni­ng, heating and driving? Why do voters and taxpayers willingly underwrite the uncontroll­ed energy habits of their neighbours?

Ask yourself that the next time your monthly bill arrives and you look up the line for your magical Ontario Electricit­y Rebate. It may look like a gift, but it’s grifting politician­s regifting your money.

 ?? JUSTIN TANG THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Premier Doug Ford is spending billions on a vote-buying subsidy for Ontarians’ monthly electricit­y bill, Martin Regg Cohn writes, but there doesn’t seem to be any money for health care or education.
JUSTIN TANG THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO Premier Doug Ford is spending billions on a vote-buying subsidy for Ontarians’ monthly electricit­y bill, Martin Regg Cohn writes, but there doesn’t seem to be any money for health care or education.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada