Toronto Star

Many answers missing about transgende­r youth

- ROSIE DIMANNO

It’s become impossible to speak rationally, without denunciati­on and vituperati­on, about the transgende­r debate. Toxicity is rife at both ends of the spectrum.

Trans activists are over the top, demonizing and cancelling and TERF-ing (trans-exclusiona­ry radical feminism) anyone who questions the wisdom of aggressive, sometimes irreversib­le interventi­on.

Political conservati­ves have exploited the unease around not just transition­ing gender but biological men using women’s dressing rooms, washrooms, participat­ing in women’s sports, and placed in women’s prisons and halfway houses — the latter especially traumatizi­ng for women who’ve been sexually assaulted by men. Right-wing rhetoric goes much deeper as well, routinely focusing on — tormenting — people who are the process of transition­ing or have already transition­ed.

But the primary considerat­ion, underscore­d by what should be respect and kindness for all, is the potential harm being done to children and adolescent­s when so little is known — the peer-reviewed literature scant, the long-term effects unclear — about the physical, psychologi­cal and emotional impact on transition­ing youth who’ve identified as trans and undertaken treatment that ranges from puberty blockers to surgery.

There is a troubling void here about what works and what might be dangerous, precisely because the supporting science is weak and disputed.

This is at the core of an exhaustive and rigorous report, led by British pediatrici­an Dr. Hilary Cass — past president of the Royal College of Paediatric­s and Child Health — commission­ed by the U.K.’s National Health Service, released this week.

“The rationale for early puberty suppressio­ns remains unclear, with weak evidence regarding the impact on gender dysphoria, mental or psychosoci­al health,” says the Cass Review. It recommends that children wishing to transgende­r should be given more “holistic” treatment, including screening for autism (a disproport­ionate number are on the autism spectrum disorder) and a broader mental health assessment.

The review was commission­ed in 2020 after the number of adolescent­s who’d presented to the NHS Gender Identity Developmen­t Service — run by a trust and shut down last year after some clinicians within the organizati­on reported their fears that patients were being referred too quickly to gender transition­ing — began to rise rapidly and dramatical­ly. The number of patients seeking trans treatment had soared from about 50 in 2009 to nearly 1,800 in 2016, to 5,000 in 202122 and, before the GIDS was shuttered, 5,800 children were on the waiting list, according to the NHS. The swell was largely driven by patients raised as girls.

Research by England’s University of York, run in tandem with the review, found evidence was “severely lacking” on the impact of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, while the majority of clinical guidelines were found not to have followed internatio­nal standards. In fact, most of the gender dysphoria clinics to which patients from GIDS were moved refused to provide any of their data for the Cass Review. NHS has now demanded it all be turned over and the clinics instructed to end appointmen­ts for everyone under age 18.

“The adoption of a treatment with uncertain benefits without further scrutiny is a significan­t departure from establishe­d (medical) practice,” states the 388-page Cass Review. “There are few other areas of health care where profession­als are so afraid to openly discuss their views, where people are vilified on social media, and where name-calling echoes the worst bullying behaviour.”

The report says the boom in adolescent­s seeking to change sex can’t be explained alone by the fact that trans identities are now generally more accepted by the (western) world at large, though this, the report attests, is a large part of it. It argues that the surge must be analyzed in the context of a boom in mental health problems among young British people in the past decade, a constituen­cy ill-served, while youth have been inundated by trans-promoting messaging on social media and YouTube videos being absorbed particular­ly by generation Z and generation Alpha (those born since 2010), who’ve grown up with “unpreceden­ted’’ online lives.

“Biology hasn’t changed and adult biology hasn’t changed in the last few years,’’ Cass said in a BBC interview Wednesday. “So it’s not that that’s changed things. I don’t think that young people today are being exposed to more abuse, or trauma or so on, than previous generation­s. We do have to think very seriously about the impact of social media.’’

According to the report, girls spend many more hours using social media than boys — three or more hours a day by 43 per cent of them, compared to 22 per cent of boys. This might go a long way toward explaining why the explosion in youth seeking to transgende­r is exponentia­lly higher for “birth-registered” girls presenting in their early teens, many experienci­ng mental distress, anxiety and depression associated with body image, at a time when they are struggling with changes brought on by puberty onset.

Many, in fact, later desist, says the report, identifyin­g as lesbian, non-binary or asexual.

Cross-sex hormones, says the review, should be provided only to children over 16 and even then, with “extreme caution.” As Cass concludes, it is essential to guard against “the creep of unproven approaches in clinical practice.”

While puberty blockers were promoted by the trans community and some medical organizati­ons as providing an opportunit­y for youth to press pause on gender-maturing characteri­stics — giving them time to explore their identity — the review found no evidence that blockers improved a youth’s body dysmorphia or body image. Rather, there was concern about treatments “built on shaky foundation­s” that “may change the trajectory of psychosexu­al and gender identity developmen­t.”

Primum non nocere. First, do no harm — the Hippocrati­c Oath.

A new review in the U.K was commission­ed in 2020 after the number of adolescent­s seeking gender transition­ing treatment began to rise rapidly and dramatical­ly

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada