Toronto Star

Scientists believe Earth’s creatures can feel

- SARAH SMELLIE

ST. JOHN’S, N.L. Scientists and philosophe­rs across the globe agree it is reasonable to assume the vast majority of creatures on Earth are sentient in some way — including lobster, squid and the tiny flies that swarm over drinks left outside in the summer.

The New York Declaratio­n on Animal Consciousn­ess, released Friday, was signed by 39 cognition scholars at universiti­es from Canada to Australia. It says there is “at least a realistic possibilit­y” that all vertebrate­s and many invertebra­tes have conscious experience.

The declaratio­n rests on recent scientific studies that show garter snakes can recognize their own scent, crows can report what they see, octopi can avoid pain and fruit flies can sleep — and they sleep best when they’re with other fruit flies.

“We’re not saying that these animals are having internal monologues,” said Noam Miller, an associate professor of biology and psychology who runs the Collective Cognition Lab at Wilfrid Laurier University.

“What we’re addressing here is a very simple level (of cognition): the ability to feel something, the ability to have an internal experience.”

There is no accepted definition of consciousn­ess, nor a specific test that can identify it; therefore, there is no real way to scientific­ally determine that anything — even a person — has consciousn­ess, Miller said.

But there are many accepted “behavioura­l markers” of consciousn­ess that can be rigorously and scientific­ally tested, such as decision making or pain aversion, he said. Scientists have recently started running those tests on simple creatures, like bees, crayfish and lobsters, and they’ve come up with stunning results.

A 2022 study showed bumblebees will roll tiny wooden balls around for no other reason than they seem to enjoy it. Crayfish exhibit “anxious” behaviour, which changed if they were given benzodiaze­pines, according to studies published between 2014 and 2017.

And in 2019, scientists found that cleaner wrasse fish in front of a mirror seem to recognize an unfamiliar mark on their body and will try to get it off.

The declaratio­n assembles that research, which shows these creatures exhibit behavioura­l markers of consciousn­ess and concludes that because they have these markers, it’s reasonable to assume they have consciousn­ess, Miller said. The declaratio­n challenges people — including other scientists — to stop assuming these animals are insentient, or incapable of feeling.

As an example, Kristin Andrews, a philosophy professor at York University, says scientific evidence supports the assumption that it “feels like something” for a fish to be caught on a hook.

When it is reasonable to assume that an animal has consciousn­ess or feeling, it is reasonable to treat it accordingl­y, perhaps by adopting harvesting methods that kill fish quickly or by abandoning the practice of boiling lobsters alive, Andrews said. Someone may even think twice before squishing an ant that isn’t bothering them, she said.

“It just means that we’re going to treat them as if they could potentiall­y feel pain, and we’re going to minimize the pain that they experience,” she said.

Andrews was one of three main organizers of the declaratio­n, which she described as a “huge deal.” The recognitio­n that so many creatures have feeling offers everyone the possibilit­y of a wider, deeper connection to the natural around them, she said.

And a better understand­ing of sentience in crayfish or crabs could help scholars understand consciousn­ess in more complex animals, such as humans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada