Toronto Star

We need more taxing the rich

- MARC LEE AND D.T. COCHRANE CONTRIBUTO­RS MARC LEE IS A SENIOR ECONOMIST WITH THE CANADIAN CENTRE FOR POLICY ALTERNATIV­ES. D.T. COCHRANE IS A SENIOR ECONOMIST WITH THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS AND FORMER POLICY ANALYST WITH CANADIANS FOR TAX FAIRNESS.

The big surprise in the 2024 federal budget was a very small, but very important, tax increase on the richest Canadians. Although it is modest, the increase has some on Bay Street fuming. But the reality is we need to do much more to improve tax fairness and reduce the growing gap between the rich and the rest of us.

The 2024 tax changes affect capital gains, or the income received when selling an asset above its purchase price. Currently, only half of capital gains are taxable, with exemptions for primary residences and up to $1million in other qualifying assets, such as farming and fishing property.

Under the new rules, 66 per cent of the gains above $250,000 will be taxable. The primary residence exemption remains, with the lifetime exemption increased to $1.25 million.

This change is expected to raise $18 billion over the next five years and to be paid by only the 40,000 or so richest individual­s. But even with the 2024 change, the income from buying and selling assets will be taxed less than from working.

These discrepanc­ies lie at the heart of inequities in the Canadian tax system. The highest-income households benefit from several sources of untaxed or lightly taxed income.

A fair tax system should tax the same amount of income at the same rate regardless of the source. Bay Street accountant Kenneth Carter, who headed a royal commission on taxation in the mid-1960s, captured this notion with his comment that “a buck is a buck.”

Carter and the other commission­ers also advocated an overall progressiv­e tax system. Have we achieved that?

Our new study of Canada’s tax system, which examined all sources of income and all taxes across the income distributi­on, finds that we have not.

Taxes at the bottom of the income distributi­on are modestly progressiv­e. Then, there is a flat tax structure through the middle. Finally, it gets regressive at the top with the top five per cent paying a lower rate than the bottom 95 per cent, and the top one per cent paying an even lower rate.

Part of the problem is the partial exclusion of capital gains because as you approach the top, ever more income is from owning rather than working.

Further, many taxes, such as property taxes and payroll taxes, are not progressiv­e.

Since 2004, Canada’s tax system has become less progressiv­e, with rates in 2022 as much as 4.7 percentage points higher for the bottom two deciles.

One positive developmen­t is that rates for the top five per cent of households are somewhat higher in 2022 than 2004, largely due to the addition of a new top income tax bracket in 2016.

The new capital gains inclusion rate will help nudge up rates at the very top.

Outside of the top five per cent, federal taxes were generally lower in 2022 than 2004. However, this reduction was more-than-offset by higher provincial taxes. Provincial tax distributi­on is more regressive across the whole distributi­on and has become more so.

What should be done?

First, we need higher top rates and eliminatio­n of various tax preference­s, like capital gains exclusion, that primarily benefit top earners.

In addition, we need to tax inheritanc­es and wealth to level the generation­al playing field.

Finally, we need to increase corporate taxes with a focus on windfall taxes in sectors like groceries and oil and gas.

A fair and decent society should have neither extreme of obscenely rich nor desperatel­y poor citizens. Taxation of the wealthiest is a central means to reduce inequality, provide robust public infrastruc­ture and services that benefit all, and create opportunit­ies for all to live a decent life.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada