Toronto Star

McGill seeks court injunction

Montreal university tells judge pro-Palestinia­n protesters are ‘occupiers’

- MORGAN LOWRIE

Pro-Palestinia­n protesters at McGill University have become “occupiers” living in a fortified and barricaded mini-village, a lawyer for the Montreal school argued on Monday as he asked for an injunction to dismantle the more than two-week-old encampment on its downtown campus.

As lawyers for the encampment members defended the right to protest, McGill lawyer Jacques Darche maintained the encampment presents a health and safety risk and is preventing McGill from holding convocatio­n ceremonies on its property.

He told Quebec Superior Court that while universiti­es respect freedom of expression, those who have pitched dozens of tents on its lower field are not mere protesters. “The proper term, in our view, is occupiers or campers,” he said.

He said there’s a difference between protesting, “with signs and slogans and groups of people, and camping in an encampment, fenced in with a quasi-permanent structure.”

In a judicial applicatio­n dated Friday, McGill says the encampment is a “security, safety and public health risk” that has escalated tensions on campus. In its filing, McGill cited the “fierce verbal exchanges” between protesters and counterpro­testers earlier this month, barrels of possible “human waste” on site, possible fire code breaches and the encampment’s potential as a “magnet” for further clashes.

Lawyers representi­ng different groups of protesters countered that there’s no proof the encampment is dangerous, nor that there is an urgent need to dismantle it.

Julius Grey, a lawyer representi­ng some of the encampment members, said the right to protest is fundamenta­l and that universiti­es have traditiona­lly been treated differentl­y than other private property when it comes to demonstrat­ions. “The right of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly must be given significan­t weight,” given the nature of the property he said, adding that a university cannot be compared “to someone’s house or living room.”

Another lawyer, Alexandre Romano, said the protesters aren’t blocking access to the school, have fire extinguish­ers and emergency exits, and don’t cook on site. He noted that police, who are responsibl­e for intervenin­g in dangerous situations, have thus far declined to dismantle the camp.

The protesters fenced off an area and erected tents on April 27, following a wave of similar campus protests in the United States. The protesters are demanding the university divest from companies that are “complicit” in Israel’s occupation of the Palestinia­n territorie­s, and cut ties with Israeli institutio­ns.

Justice Marc St-Pierre is expected to deliver a decision as early as Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Alberta’s government says it will ask the provincial police watchdog to investigat­e the clearing of two pro-Palestinia­n campus protest encampment­s by police with riot gear.

Premier Danielle Smith says reports of potential injuries during the police clearings prompted the call for the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team to make sure there was no unreasonab­le use of force.

Both the University of Calgary and the University of Alberta have said the encampment­s on their campuses violated rules against trespassin­g.

 ?? RYAN REMIORZ THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? McGill University says the pro-Palestinia­n encampment on its campus poses a “security, safety and public health risk.”
RYAN REMIORZ THE CANADIAN PRESS McGill University says the pro-Palestinia­n encampment on its campus poses a “security, safety and public health risk.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada