A greater force
Another municipal unit joins call for public inquiry into offshore exploration risks
The Municipality of Barrington has added its voice to the call for a moratorium on further offshore exploration pending a full federal/ provincial public inquiry into the true risks of offshore petroleum development in waters off Nova Scotia.
The call for the public inquiry was initiated last summer by the Offshore Alliance, a coalition of fisher, social justice and environmental organizations, as well as communities and individuals who have concerns with offshore drilling in Nova Scotia. Integrity of the regulatory regime overseeing it is also a concern.
Members of the Alliance, such as the Clean Action Ocean Committee (COAC), have been lobbying municipal units along the South Shore and throughout southwestern Nova Scotia for support and getting it. The town and Municipality of Shelburne, the municipality and Town of Lunenburg, the Town of Mahone Bay and the Municipality of Clare have also supported the call. The request is pending to other municipal units
in the region.
“This is a reasonable request,” said COAC executive director John Davis in a presentation to municipal councillors in Barrington. “We just want to know what the risks are and we want to make the assessment if those risks are reasonable.”
Cape Sable Island seafood producer Nathan Blades told councillors what raised the concerns of the fishing industry was the Canada Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (CNSOPB) 2015 call for bids which included two parcels “on some of the biggest fishing industry grounds that we have next to Georges Bank.”
Those two parcels, now identified as Exploration Licences 2435 and 2436, are leased to Equinor Canada Ltd, who have an application to conduct seismic activity pending the completion, submission and approval of an Environmental Assessment by the CNSOPB.
Blades said at the time he felt, and still feels, the two industries should be able to co-exist.
“Where we are the incumbent industry, we think the oil industry needs to be able to prove to us they can operate safely and they need to respect our territory,” he said.
In an attempt to have industry’s concerns heard, Blades said he was part of a fisheries advisory council group that met three or four times a year with the CNSOPB.
“Where we are the incumbent industry, we think the oil industry needs to be able to prove to us they can operate safely and they need to respect our territory.”
— Cape Sable Island seafood producer Nathan Blades
“I went to a couple of meetings with a list of things that the (seafood) industry needs in order for the oil and gas industry to prove they can operate safely,” he said. “The list was we don’t want oil and gas activities happening near the most sensitive areas of the ocean. We don’t want dispersants used in the offshore. We want a capping stack located on the east coast, preferably in Nova Scotia” that would have a 24-hour response time in the event of a well blow out, and “some kind of insurance fund that the oil and gas industry would contribute to in the event an emergency happens in the offshore and wipes out the seafood industry. To all those things they said no.”
Blades said he came home and thought about it.
“That’s really the only contact the CNSOPB has with the seafood industry. Four or five guys from the industry” attend the meetings “where there are no binding decisions made. They don’t have to do anything and that’s basically what they have done. You go to this meeting ask a few questions, make a few demands and the CNSOPB chair says we don’t think that’s reasonable, we’re not going to do that, we don’t think that’s necessary. That told me if they’re trying to pass this off as an industry consultation piece which is what they’re trying to pass it off as, it’s a horrible failure. At that point I stopped going to the meetings because I could not, in good conscience, have my name attached to that group to make it look like I am on that committee and in approval of what CNSOPB does. I don’t want them to use words that I say as some kind of indication of industry consultation.”
According to provincial statistics, there are 25,000 people employed in the fishing industry on land and at sea, which carries a $2-billion value just in exports. That’s not including spin-off industries such as trucking, boat building, lobster trap building and fishing gear manufacturing.