Truro News

Project violates Fisheries Act: opponents

- FRANCIS CAMPBELL

HALIFAX, N.S. – A group ardently opposed to the Alton Gas project say they have acquired federal Environmen­t Department documents that show the project violates federal Fisheries Act regulation­s.

Robin Tress, a climate and social justice campaigner for the Council of Canadians, said documents obtained from freedom of informatio­n requests backs up “concerns that the project would have serious impacts on the Shubenacad­ie River, the fish within it and the (Mi’kmaq) treaties.”

The controvers­ial solution mining project, in the works for about a dozen years, would have Alton Gas, a subsidiary of Altagas, draw nearly 10,000 cubic metres of water daily from the Shubenacad­ie River estuary at Fort Ellis, Colchester County, piping it to a cavern site off Brentwood Road, near Alton. There, the water would be pumped nearly 1,000 metres undergroun­d to flush out salt to create two natural gas storage caverns.

The brine created by the salt dissolutio­n would then be pumped back to a mixing pond at the estuary before being released into the river system, a gradual discharge of 1.3 million cubic metres of salt over a two- to three-year period.

Among the documents produced Tuesday by the group opposed to the project is a May 2016 communicat­ion filed by Paula Jackman, a toxicology lab supervisor with the federal Environmen­t Department, that concludes “for a short period of time any fish in this mixing zone may be exposed to elevated salinity levels above those considered safe for marine and estuarine organisms.”

Jackman stated that “high salinity such as those expected in the brine are considered deleteriou­s substances according to the Fisheries Act.”

Partners Dale Poulette and Rachael Greenland-smith have long opposed the project and filed more than 20 freedom of informatio­n requests to obtain documents from various federal and provincial government department­s.

“We have proven the brine, which Alton Gas holds a provincial industrial approval to release into the Shubenacad­ie River, would cause serious harm to fish and fish habitat,” Greenland-smith said at a news conference held at the Shubenacad­ie Canal Commission building in Dartmouth.

She said concerns have been raised by Nova Scotia Environmen­t and the federal Fisheries and Environmen­t department­s since the project’s inception.

“The problem is that these concerns were never addressed properly, leading to Alton Gas receiving industrial approval for a project that doesn’t meet basic environmen­tal protection laws,” Greenland-smith said.

She said the 260 parts salt per a thousand parts of water, which is permitted under the 2016 provincial industrial approval for the brining operation, meets the criteria of a deleteriou­s substance.

“This will cause harm to fish and fish habitat, thus affecting the rights of Mi’kmaw people to exercise their treaty rights and it would cause serious harm to the Shubenacad­ie River and species at risk that frequent that water.”

A second communicat­ion from Shawn Sanson of the federal Environmen­t Department dated February 2018 suggested pre-emptive measures to prevent the release of a deleteriou­s substance into the river system but the measures suggested were redacted in the exchange obtained through a freedom of informatio­n request.

Poulette said a misconcept­ion exists that only salt would be dumped into the river as part of the brine.

“We know for a fact through the toxicology reports that it is not just salt,” Poulette said. The brine would contain heavy metals, trace minerals, arsenic “and a bunch of chemicals that we can’t even pronounce,” he said.

Alton spokeswoma­n Lori Maclean said the project review process resulted in both a provincial environmen­tal assessment approval and an industrial approval and that the federal Environmen­t Department will further regulate the release of brine.

“With ongoing direction from regulators regarding their expectatio­ns, we have continued to evaluate and improve the brine release process to address stakeholde­r concerns,” Maclean said.

“To date, the brining process used to build the natural gas storage caverns has not started and no brine has been released into the Shubenacad­ie River. This work will not begin until all regulatory conditions have been satisfied.”

Tress said that when Environmen­t Canada learned of the Fisheries Act violations, instead of holding the company accountabl­e, it decided to lower the regulatory bar.

“Last year, we saw Environmen­t Canada begin the process of creating new regulation­s under the Fisheries Act that apply exclusivel­y to Alton and will benefit this project,” Tress said.

“Nothing about this project has changed, nothing about the brine has changed and now what they are trying to do is change the rules so it no longer violates the Fisheries Act. You can change the law but you can’t change the fact that the substance is harmful to fish.”

Tress and the group are pushing the provincial government to “suspend all permits associated with Alton Gas because we know that the company is not in compliance with those permits.”

 ?? FRANCIS CAMPBELL ?? Rachael Greenland-smith, accompanie­d by Dale Poulette, talk about documents obtained through freedom of informatio­n requests that she says show the federal Environmen­t Department had acknowledg­ed that the Alton Gas project, as currently proposed, violates the federal Fisheries Act.
FRANCIS CAMPBELL Rachael Greenland-smith, accompanie­d by Dale Poulette, talk about documents obtained through freedom of informatio­n requests that she says show the federal Environmen­t Department had acknowledg­ed that the Alton Gas project, as currently proposed, violates the federal Fisheries Act.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada