Vancouver Sun

China’s toxins spill may last years: experts

POLLUTION I Officials fear toxic chemicals will become embedded in river ice and mud

- BY CHRISTOPHE­R BODEEN

HARBIN, China — Experts warned Tuesday that dangers from a huge chemical spill in this northeaste­rn Chinese city could last for years because of toxins — including cancer- causing benzene — imbedded in ice and mud at the bottom of the Songhua River.

Their concern came as city officials in Harbin and down river in Russia’s Far East, where the 80kilometr­e-long chemical slick was headed, sought to reassure residents their tap water was clean.

“Harbin’s water is now safe to use and drink,” Xiu Tinggong, vice-director of the city’s health inspection bureau, said on local state television. “Everybody can rest assured.”

In Khabarovsk, Russia, a top environmen­tal official drank a glass of tap water on television to show his confidence in its purity. Officials estimate the benzene spill flowing from the Songhua into the larger Heilong River, called the Amur in Russia, should reach the border city around Dec. 10- 12 — or sooner.

Water was shut off for five days in Harbin, the capital of the northeaste­rn province of Heilongjia­ng famed for its annual winter ice festival, after a Nov. 13 explosion at a nearby chemical plant.

The blast, which authoritie­s said killed five people, spewed 100 tonnes of benzene and related toxins into the Songhua, which passes through Harbin and provides most of the city’s drinking water.

Running water resumed Sunday for Harbin’s 3.8 million people, but many residents said they were sticking with bottled water. In parts of the city, water from taps ran dirty.

At Jinshan Restaurant, chefs were busily stuffing and wrapping meat and vegetable dumplings — but steaming them with bottled water.

In Russia, the Emergency Situations Ministry said the pollutants could affect 70 Russian cities and villages with a total of more than one million residents along the Amur River.

A spokesman for the World Wide Fund for Nature said the river faced “ecological catastroph­e” from the chemical slick.

Associated Press

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada