Vancouver Sun

Moon deserves blame in sinking of Titanic: scientist

Tide- raising event sent unusually large number of icebergs south, researcher­s say

- BY JIM FORSYTH

SAN ANTONIO, Tex. — A century after the Titanic disaster, scientists have found an unexpected culprit for the sinking: the moon.

Anyone who knows history or has seen the blockbuste­r movies knows that the cause of the transatlan­tic liner’s accident 100 years ago next month was that it hit an iceberg.

“But the lunar connection may explain how an unusually large number of icebergs got into the path of the Titanic,” said Donald Olson, a Texas State University physicist whose team of forensic astronomer­s examined the moon’s role.

Ever since the Titanic sank in the early hours of April 15, 1912, killing 1,517 people, researcher­s have puzzled over Captain Edward Smith’s seeming disregard of warnings that icebergs were in the area where the ship was sailing.

Smith was the most experience­d captain in the White Star Line and had sailed the North Atlantic sea lanes on numerous occasions. He had been assigned to the maiden voyage of the Titanic because he was a knowledgea­ble and careful seaman.

Greenland icebergs of the type that the Titanic struck generally become stuck in the shallow waters off Labrador and Newfoundla­nd, and cannot resume moving southward until they have melted enough to re- float or a high tide frees them, Olson said.

So how was it that such a large number of icebergs had unexpected­ly floated so far south that they were in the shipping lanes well south of Newfoundla­nd that night?

The team investigat­ed speculatio­n by the late oceanograp­her Fergus Wood that an unusually close approach by the moon in January 1912 may have produced such high tides that far more icebergs than usual separated from Greenland, and floated, still fully grown, into shipping lanes that had been moved south that spring because of reports of icebergs.

Olson said a “once-in-many-lifetimes” event occurred on Jan. 4, 1912, when the moon and sun lined up in such a way that their gravitatio­nal pulls enhanced each other. At the same time, the moon’s closest approach to Earth that January was the closest in 1,400 years, and the point of closest approach occurred within six minutes of the full moon. On top of that, the Earth’s closest approach to the sun in a year had happened just the previous day.

“This configurat­ion maximized the moon’s tide- raising forces on the Earth’s oceans,” Olson said. “That’s remarkable.”

His research determined that to reach the shipping lanes by mid- April, the iceberg that the Titanic struck must have broken off from Greenland in January 1912. The high tide caused by the bizarre combinatio­n of astronomic­al events would have been enough to dislodge icebergs and give them enough buoyancy to reach the shipping lanes by April, he said.

Olson’s team has sought to use tide patterns to determine exactly when Julius Caesar invaded Britain and prove the legend that Mary Shelley was inspired by a bright full moon shining through her window to write the gothic classic Frankenste­in.

The team’s Titanic research may have vindicated Captain Smith — albeit a century too late — by showing that he had a good excuse to react so casually to a report of ice in the ship’s path. He had no reason at the time to believe that the bergs he was facing were as numerous or as large as they turned out to be, Olson said. ( An internatio­nal iceberg tracking system was set up after the disaster.)

“In astronomic­al terms, the odds of all these variables lining up in just the way they did was, well, astronomic­al,” he said.

The research will appear in the April issue of Sky & Telescope magazine.

 ??  ?? The Titanic, shown here leaving England on its maiden ( and final) voyage, hit an iceberg in the early hours of April 15, 1912.
The Titanic, shown here leaving England on its maiden ( and final) voyage, hit an iceberg in the early hours of April 15, 1912.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada