Vancouver Sun

B. C. Tory MP backs down on opposition to Bill C- 38

Wilks flip- flops day after saying he’d ‘ stand up’ to own party

- BY PETER O’NEIL David Wilks speaks Poneil@ postmedia. com Twitter. com/ poneilinot­tawa Read my blog, Letter from Ottawa, at vancouvers­un. com/ oneil

OTTAWA — A B. C. Conservati­ve MP’S flip- flop Wednesday on whether he’ll support Bill C- 38, the federal government’s huge budget implementa­tion bill, serves as a bleak reminder of the weak status of ordinary parliament­arians in Canadian democracy, say experts.

David Wilks, MP for KootenayCo­lumbia and a former RCMP officer, made a stunning statement to about 30 constituen­ts at a meeting in Revelstoke Tuesday: “I will stand up and say the Harper government should get rid of Bill C- 38.”

Wilks, who delivered a speech in the Commons earlier this month in favour of the bill, apparently knew he was being recorded Tuesday. The video was widely viewed on social media Wednesday, and featured city residents upset about provisions of the bill such as the watering down of the federal Fisheries Act.

Wilks said he shared their concerns about the need for the 425- page bill to be broken up into several different pieces of legislatio­n. “I think you’ll find a [ group] of Conservati­ves that do hold your concerns. And I am one of them.”

But Wilks issued a statement Wednesday “in response to a media report” after the video sparked enormous interest on Twitter.

“I wish to clarify my position with regard to Bill C- 38, the Jobs, Growth and Long- Term Prosperity Act,” Wilks said. “I support this bill, and the jobs and growth measures that it will bring for Canadians in Kootenay- Columbia and right across the country.”

The flip- flop underscore­s the strict control party leaders have over ordinary backbenche­rs, said Queen’s University political scientist Ned Franks, an expert on Parliament and democracy.

In the United Kingdom, MPS are beholden to their riding associatio­ns, not their leaders or party brass, he said.

“Our whole system has been developed to privilege the party leaders over the constituen­cy representa­tion rule of the MPS. And that’s what you’re seeing here.”

An MP who takes orders from party leaders rather than constituen­ts is probably acceptable for the minority of Canadians who support the MP’S party. “But for the rest of them, they look at the MPS as trained seals. And it’s unfortunat­e,” he said.

The University of Victoria’s Norman Ruff said Wilks’ apparent empathy for his constituen­ts’ concerns melted under the weight of political reality. “MPS who struggle against party discipline forfeit any ambitions they might have to rise above backbenche­r, or worse, settle to be still more of a non- entity as an independen­t member.”

Wilks was initially cautious at the Tuesday meeting,

“If Canadians want it changed, then enough Canadians have to stand up to their MPS and say ‘ no’ … I will stand up and say the Harper government should get rid of Bill C- 38.” “I wish to clarify my position with regard to Bill C- 38, the Jobs, Growth and Long- Term Prosperity Act. I support this bill, and the jobs and growth measures that it will bring for Canadians in KootenayCo­lumbia and right across the country.”

explaining “how Ottawa works” and saying if he voted against the bill he would be forced to sit as an independen­t — a prospect at least one participan­t said would be worthwhile to send a message about democracy.

The MP said he hadn’t participat­ed in a free vote since his election.

“If I stand up and say no, it still passes,” Wilks said. “Canadians collective­ly have to put enough pressure on at least 13 members of Parliament.”

A young man who filmed the meeting then interjecte­d: “I’m filming you right now. Will you allow me to put that message to all Canadians, through Internet networks, so they know what your message is for Canadians?”

Wilks looked into the camera and said: “If Canadians want it changed, then enough Canadians have to stand up to their MPS and say ‘ no’.”

A call to Wilks’s office in Cranbrook wasn’t immediatel­y returned.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada