Vancouver Sun

Mid- season stats offer no surprises

On- ice product gets players approval

- SCOTT CRUICKSHAN­K With files from Vicki Hall

Eager to reward long-deprived fans, eager to appease high- profile employees, the National Hockey League had sought change.

No one wanted to extend the dead- puck era, during which offence had evaporated, during which holding up and pulling down had been winked at ( but not whistled at).

So the NHL, after wasting the 2004- 05 season with labour squabbles, had been keen to repackage its on- ice product. Desperate for an uptempo brand of hockey, the league’s competitio­n committee initiated a plan to showcase the stars:

The shootout would be introduced. Two- line passes would be legalized. Obstructio­n would not be tolerated. Puck- handling by goalies would be minimized. Additional­ly, size of goalie pads was reduced, nets were moved closer to the end boards, neutral zones were shrunk, tag- up offsides were reinstated.

There you had it, the goal-friendly framework for what years to come would be referred to as the “new NHL.” The scheme worked, immediatel­y.

The following season, goals came at a clip not seen since 1995- 96. Power- play opportunit­ies per game, nearly a dozen on average, went to the highest levels since, well, ever.

It was considered a success, particular­ly by top- flight skaters for whom the adjustment was smooth.

Fast- forward to the NHL’s latest lockout, which effectivel­y snipped the 2012 from the 2012- 13 season, leaving a 48- game schedule. Players returned, keen to compete. Fans returned, keen to watch. And, peeling back the wrapper from another post- lockout winter, this version of hockey is — drum roll, please . . . .

“Same as it was last year,” Calgary Flames forward Michael Cammalleri says with a shrug.

Adds teammate Alex Tanguay: “Nothing’s changed. Things for us, as players, are very, very similar to what they were before.”

Updated statistics appear to back that assessment. Goals are up, but down from 200910. Power- play goals are up, but down from 2008- 09. Shots are up, but down from 2010- 11. Fights are up, but down from 2009- 10.

So anyone hunting for grand revelation­s about trends at this season’s midpoint is in for disappoint­ment.

“Certainly, it’s good hockey,” says Tanguay. “Entertaini­ng. It’s been fun for me to watch.”

Currently, output for a team is 2.80 goals. In 2003- 04 — the final winter of the deadpuck era — that average was 2.57, the lowest since 1955- 56. During the NHL’s freewheeli­ng years — 1972- 94 — teams averaged 3.20 goals per game. It peaked at 4.01 in 1981- 82.

Selanne insists he wouldn’t touch today’s product.

“I think it’s pretty good right now,” he says.

 ?? MATT YORK/ THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? There have been more fights this season compared to last, but fewer than during 2009- 10. The same holds true for goals.
MATT YORK/ THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES There have been more fights this season compared to last, but fewer than during 2009- 10. The same holds true for goals.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada