Vancouver Sun

E- waste makes up a third of illegal material headed to landfill

But drops in other types of trash, such as cardboard and plastic, mean actual amount of electronic discards has not risen: report

- BRIAN MORTON bmorton@vancouvers­un.com Read breaking news on your mobile device at vancouvers­un.com

Metro Vancouver residents and commercial trash haulers don’t seem to be getting the message that electronic waste and leftover paint are not allowed in our landfills.

Electronic waste — or e- waste — accounted for 35 per cent of the recyclable materials cited for violations during inspection­s at Metro Vancouver waste facilities in 2013. That’s up from 20 per cent in 2010.

Paint also showed a sharp rise over the three- year period, from one per cent of violations in 2010 to 10 per cent in 2013.

Oil rose from two per cent in 2010 to four per cent in 2013.

The figures were in a report presented Thursday to the Greater Vancouver Regional District’s Zero Waste Committee, of which Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie is chairman.

“There was no cause for alarm, but it does highlight the distance we still have to go to meet our diversion targets,” Brodie said.

“We’re working very hard to increase the diversion of waste in many different ways, through recycling, reduction and all the other ways,” added Brodie, saying no recommenda­tions were made or actions taken Thursday because the committee received the report for informatio­n only.

“We’ve still got a long way to go, but as a region we’re around the 58 per cent waste diversion mark and we want to get to 70 per cent by next year.”

The report, by Solid Waste Services project engineer Brandon Ho, had some encouragin­g figures, too. Materials other than paint, oil and e- waste showed a correspond­ing drop in violations: cardboard went from 30 per cent of violations in 2010 to 18 per cent in 2013; green waste from eight per cent to two per cent; gypsum from five per cent to three per cent; plastic and paper from two per cent to one per cent; and recyclable mattresses from 18 per cent in 2011 to 10 per cent in 2013.

Because of that correspond­ing drop, Brodie noted that the actual levels of e- waste sent to landfills has stayed about the same — only the percentage has gone up. “( The report) shows the percentage of electronic waste is going up because other materials are going down. “The amount stays the same.” E- waste can include items such as audio- visual equipment, cellphones, fluorescen­t lamps and appliances.

The report also noted that in 2013, 18.7 per cent ( 156,432) of the inbound loads to Metro Vancouver facilities were inspected and 5,857 failure notices were issued, a 3.7 per cent violation rate.

That compares with a 3.2 per cent violation rate in 2012, a 2.9 per cent violation rate in 2011 and a 3.6 per cent violation rate in 2010.

It showed that the violation rate for inspection­s of commercial haulers was 8.9 per cent, municipali­ties 3.4 per cent, and residentia­l drop- off 0.6 per cent.

Inspectors charge a surcharge of $ 50 to $ 500 to those who show up at the landfill wanting to dump recyclable waste.

The total value of surcharges levied was $ 454,000, while the cost of the inspection­s contract is $ 452,000. “On this basis, the material inspection program operated on an approximat­ely cost neutral basis,” the report said.

Meanwhile, The Vancouver Sun reported earlier this year that Metro Vancouver penalized 17 waste haulers about $ 350,000 for delivering trash to regional solid- waste facilities that contained banned items ranging from corrugated cardboard to yard trimmings and electronic­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada