Vancouver Sun

Terror bill a ‘call for action’

New legislatio­n gives security officials greatly expanded powers

- IAN MACLEOD AND LEE BERTHIAUME

OTTAWA — Sweeping new anti- terrorism legislatio­n introduced by the federal government Friday would make it illegal to promote or advocate terrorism acts, a crime punishable by up to five years in prison.

It would allow security officials to block websites, and government agencies to share citizens’ personal informatio­n for the purposes of battling terrorism.

And it would include placing people on a no-fly list if they planned to travel abroad to join groups such as the Islamic State (also known as ISIS or ISIL).

The legislatio­n, titled the Anti- terrorism Act 2015, is the most dramatic package of new laws since the Anti-terrorism Act of 2001, passed in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against the United States.

The new legislatio­n would relax privacy law restrictio­ns to allow passport and other government officials to share informatio­n on passport applicants with national security officials.

And it would lower the legal threshold for police to obtain a warrant to arrest people who have committed no crimes and hold them in custody for up to seven days, instead of the current 48 hours.

Many of the proposed powers would require prior consent from federal or provincial attorneys general, and need courtappro­ved warrants. As well, the review organizati­on that oversees the operations of the Canadian Security Intelligen­ce Service would be required to report annually on CSIS’s use of the new “threat disruption warrants.” Still, the package has raised concerns from some civil libertaria­ns.

But, speaking at a community centre north of Toronto, Prime Minister Stephen Harper defended the changes, saying that “jihadist terrorism” is the greatest threat the world faces.

“We cannot avoid the stark reality, jihadist terrorism is not a future possibilit­y, it is a present reality,” Harper said. “Violent jihadism is not just a danger somewhere else — it seeks to harm us here in Canada, in our cities and in our neighbourh­oods through horrific acts.”

“It would be a grave mistake to ignore their threats.”

Harper said the bill will help police and security agencies combat terrorism, but added it would be unfair to give the impression that it would prevent all attacks.

“We will continue to do our best and we will continue to move forward with other measures as threats evolve.”

Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney said the killing of a soldier in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Que., and the shootings on Oct. 22 in Ottawa, in which Cpl. Nathan Cirillo was killed, showed the government it needed to act.

“It was and still is a call for action,” Blaney said. “We then said we would not overreact, but we would not underreact.”

The proposed law would allow the CSIS agents to physically “disrupt” threats to the security of Canada, including terrorism, espionage, sabotage, foreign-influenced activities and domestic subversion.

A Justice Department official said the new, police-like powers for CSIS agent will not conflict with the anti-terrorism investigat­ions carried out by the RCMP.

“They’re going to work closer together,” he said.

Until now, CSIS has only collected and analyzed informatio­n about threats to Canada, and has advised the government on how to react.

Now the government wants CSIS to start taking action to address threats to Canada. That could include anything from disrupting websites and social media accounts to intercepti­ng goods and weapons.

In addition, it wants the Federal Court to be able to compel third parties to co-operate with CSIS. An example would be a telecommun­ications firm being forced to provide the spy agency with cellphone records or to block a website.

CSIS would also need a warrant to deal with a threat if doing so would contravene the Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the law.

But CSIS will not require a warrant or other authorizat­ion if its interventi­ons do not run up against the charter or establishe­d law, and the proposed legislatio­n does not re-establish CSIS’s internal watchdog or create any new oversight body.

 ?? FRANK GUNN/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? ‘It would be a grave mistake to ignore threats’ of jihadists, said Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Richmond Hill, Ont., Friday.
FRANK GUNN/THE CANADIAN PRESS ‘It would be a grave mistake to ignore threats’ of jihadists, said Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Richmond Hill, Ont., Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada