Vancouver Sun

Quake readiness is serious business

Natural disasters: A megathrust temblor will come one day, and we in B.C. must be prepared

- MARK DUTTON Mark Dutton is the president of Coast Capital Insurance Services and is based in Victoria. He was previously regional vice-president for southern Alberta at Western Financial Group.

On Jan. 7, a magnitude-4.6 earthquake shook Vancouver Island, startling residents of the area but causing only minor damage. It was another reminder that B.C.’s coastline is part of a geological marvel, the Ring of Fire, a hotbed for seismic activity.

But maybe the recent quake wasn’t so insignific­ant after all. Last week, the Canadian media sounded the alarm on B.C.’s vulnerabil­ity to a much larger, damaging earthquake. Experts say that Vancouver Island has a one-in-10 chance of being hit with a megathrust earthquake in the next 50 years.

Historical­ly, megathrust quakes reach magnitudes of around nine on the Richter scale.

The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and the 2011 quake that struck off Japan both fall in that category.

It’s hard to imagine this magnitude of quake occurring off the B.C. coast, but scientists confirm that it’s just a matter of time. They just don’t know precisely when, which makes it easy for the population at large to dismiss the odds and neglect to prepare.

A lack of preparedne­ss is occurring at several levels.

Last March, B.C.’s auditor general called out the provincial government, specifical­ly Emergency Management B.C., claiming “EMBC cannot demonstrat­e that it is adequately prepared to manage the effects of a catastroph­ic earthquake and it is not reporting publicly on the province’s preparedne­ss.”

Of course, preparedne­ss is not just up to government. It is a shared responsibi­lity, meaning individual­s and businesses can play integral roles. From the insurance industry perspectiv­e, it’s our job to be aware of how far the impacts of such events can reach and what steps can be taken to minimize damage. We want to share our expertise with individual­s and government as part of a collaborat­ive, integrated approach to earthquake preparedne­ss and response.

We first need to strive for a shift in mindset around the likelihood and consequenc­es of a disaster. Having experience­d the 2013 Alberta floods first-hand, I can tell you that a common reaction to the event was: I never thought this could happen to me. This should be a lesson to B.C. residents on the need to anticipate.

A report published by the Insurance Bureau of Canada in 2013 identified that more than 55 per cent of British Columbia residents don’t have earthquake insurance. Therefore, millions of people are exposed to the expense of rebuilding their homes and lives following catastroph­e. Assuming that government will step in to help restore and rebuild is a dangerous game. Consider that the 2013 ICBC report pegs personal property damages associated with a magnitude-9.0 quake at roughly $56.8 billion, with insured losses sitting at roughly $20.4 billion. It’s simply not feasible for government to shoulder the entire bill.

People also need to be prepared for an earthquake with their own personal emergency plans and supplies, such as a call-out list to relatives, as well as reserve food, water, medication and batteries for mobile communicat­ion that can last a minimum of three weeks to a month. This kind of advice needs to find its way in front of people as often as possible, and government and the insurance industry are its conduits. It is encouragin­g to see that several municipal government­s in B.C. already have disaster management sections on their websites.

Overall, more collaborat­ion between government and the insurance industry will help B.C. respond to the impact of a major quake. As risk managers, we are in the business of identifyin­g shortfalls and encouragin­g mitigation, and the government is charged with ensuring public safety. Both sides need to work together to identify priority areas and ensure integrated emergency response plans. Collaborat­ive consultati­on will ensure resources are directed to areas deemed most vulnerable to limit loss of life, property and infrastruc­ture.

As high-risk areas and their underlying hazards are identified, awareness campaigns can also be customized and disseminat­ed in these regions. Insurance companies in particular should take it upon themselves to share informatio­n and answer questions on how B.C. residents can prepare their families and homes for when an earthquake strikes.

We have seen the disastrous consequenc­es of earthquake­s and tsunamis elsewhere. These examples should prompt us to acknowledg­e the risks associated with living on or around our beautiful coastline. British Columbia has an opportunit­y to set a global example for effective disaster preparatio­n and mitigation through concerted effort.

 ?? ANDY DEAN/FOTOLIA ?? A 2013 report estimates the personal property damages in B.C. associated with a magnitude-9.0 earthquake at nearly $57 billion.
ANDY DEAN/FOTOLIA A 2013 report estimates the personal property damages in B.C. associated with a magnitude-9.0 earthquake at nearly $57 billion.
 ?? TAYLOR BALKOM/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Ron Fortunato, points to a weather monitor and explains to a group of students how it is used to forecast earthquake­s in Ketchikan, Alaska earlier this month.
TAYLOR BALKOM/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Ron Fortunato, points to a weather monitor and explains to a group of students how it is used to forecast earthquake­s in Ketchikan, Alaska earlier this month.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada