Vancouver Sun

English Bay confirms Canada’s not ready for a major oil spill

Response lacking: Coast guard’s claim 80 per cent was recovered is ludicrous

- HARRY WRUCK Harry Wruck is a lawyer at Ecojustice and served as a senior general counsel with the Department of Justice.

In the wake of the toxic fuel spill in English Bay two weeks ago, officials at all levels of government were playing the blame game and pointing fingers over a not-so-world-class spill response plan. But beneath all that posturing and righteous indignatio­n remains one simple fact: Canada — from its spill response teams to its legislativ­e framework — is not ready to handle a major spill.

I spent decades as a senior general counsel at the Department of Justice, where I prosecuted both criminal and civil oil spill cases. My work on the Nestucca oil spill — which spilled 874,000 litres of oil off the coast of Oregon, polluted the beaches of Vancouver Island and killed 35,000 migratory birds — made me intimately aware of how even a moderatesi­zed spill can impact people and the environmen­t for years after the fact.

Compared to the Exxon Valdez spill (more than 40 million litres spilled) or even the Nestucca spill, the English Bay spill was small. Still, Canada bungled its response, proving that its emergency protocols are ill-equipped to handle a spill of any size. This is not a big surprise: While much has been made of recent cuts to the coast guard, we cannot overlook the fact that Canada made the foolhardy decision in the early 1990s to sell off its oil spill cleanup equipment (at the time thought to be the best in the world) and leave emergency cleanup to the private sector.

It is easy to take issue with the coast guard’s sluggish, wholly inadequate response to the spill, but I’m particular­ly troubled by its claim that it was able to recover 80 per cent of what was spilled. Such a claim is, quite frankly, ludicrous.

In most instances, recovering 10 or 15 per cent of any spill is considered a success. This is because it is impossible to determine with any precision how much oil is released during a spill: It can dissipate into the water, sink to the ocean floor, wash up on beaches, or escape into the air. Even the coast guard admits it is likely more than the 2,700 litres of fuel first reported actually spilled into English Bay. And if you don’t know how much oil has been released, it is impossible to clean it all up.

The coast guard also appeared to be misinforme­d when it stated that it would recoup the full costs of cleaning up the spill — what it fails to appreciate is that this is much easier said than done. In dealing with recouping costs and seeking environmen­tal damages, a number of complex legal questions arise: Were the costs incurred reasonable and necessary? How do you quantify impact on wildlife or ecosystems with no market value? What happens when an endangered species is destroyed?

Unfortunat­ely, these are all questions Canadian law is not equipped to effectivel­y and efficientl­y address.

Canadian politician­s like to claim our environmen­tal laws and regulation­s are worldclass, but this is simply not true. Whether we are looking at improving drinking water standards, regulating greenhouse gas emissions or prosecutin­g polluters, the laws and regulation­s that are supposed to protect Canadians and the environmen­t are increasing­ly falling behind those of other industrial­ized nations.

I now work at Ecojustice, Canada’s only national environmen­tal law charity, where we have been involved in review processes for both Enbridge’s Northern Gateway and Kinder Morgan’s proposed Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. The latter would see a seven-fold increase in tanker traffic through Burrard Inlet. Over and over we have challenged the companies’ safety records and Canada’s emergency response plans. Again and again, they tell us that Canadians have nothing to worry about.

After what happened in English Bay, how can we trust them?

The English Bay spill was relatively small, it was a big wakeup call: We are not prepared to deal with a major oil spill. And until the tanker-sized holes in Canada’s spill response plan and legislativ­e framework are addressed, we cannot allow even a limited expansion of tanker traffic off our coasts.

 ?? DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? The coast guard estimates at least 2,700 litres of fuel leaked from the cargo ship Marathassa into Burrard Inlet earlier this month.
DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS The coast guard estimates at least 2,700 litres of fuel leaked from the cargo ship Marathassa into Burrard Inlet earlier this month.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada