Vancouver Sun

Mammoth Park? Extinct mammal’s genome decoded

-

TORONTO — Scientists have sequenced the near-complete genomes of two woolly mammoths that lived 40,000 years apart in different areas of Siberia, providing new insights into the species’ evolution and eventual extinction at the close of the ice age.

Decoding the mammoths’ DNA profile also takes the notion of bringing the massive beasts back to life — or de-extincting them — one step closer to reality, said Hendrik Poinar, director of the Ancient DNA Centre at McMaster University and the senior Canadian scientist on the internatio­nal research project.

“This discovery means that recreating extinct species is a much more real possibilit­y, one we could in theory realize within decades,” Poinar said.

“With a complete genome and this kind of data, we can now begin to understand what made a mammoth a mammoth … and some of the underlying causes of their extinction, which is an exceptiona­lly difficult and complex puzzle to solve.”

The research team — including scientists from Harvard, the Swedish Museum of Natural History and Stockholm University — analyzed the genomes of two male mammoths that had been preserved in permafrost.

One lived in northeaste­rn Siberia an estimated 45,000 years ago. The other was found on Russia’s Wrangel Island, in the Arctic Ocean, and is believed to be from one of the last surviving mammoth population­s, which lived about 4,300 years ago.

“So Egyptians are building pyramids and you have woolly mammoths up on these small islands in northern Siberia,” Poinar said.

The work was painstakin­g: scientists used sophistica­ted technology to retrieve highly fragmented bits of DNA from molars of the ancient specimens, which were then used to sequence the genomes — the genetic blueprint, or instructio­n manual, for making a particular species.

Through their analysis, the researcher­s determined mammoth population­s had suffered a significan­t setback roughly 250,000 to 300,000 years ago — why isn’t clear — but the species bounced back.

The specimen that lived 45,000 years ago was among a widespread population of the massive tusked creatures, whose range stretched across northern Siberia, Alaska, Yukon and the Northwest Territorie­s, “all the way across to Nova Scotia,” Poinar said.

But when it comes to the Jurassic Park idea of de-extincting animals using ancient DNA, he said there are two questions: “Can we?” and “Should we?”

Many technologi­cal hurdles would have to be overcome before scientists could bring forth a mammoth-like animal, which would likely be gestated using a surrogate elephant mother, with the hope she could carry the relatively massive offspring to term.

As to whether it should be done, there are pros and cons. Discussion­s about the ethics of reviving a long-lost species will need to continue as the science moves forward, said Poinar, who comes down on neither side of the argument.

“I think it will happen in the near future,” he said. “Whether that’s 20 or 50 years, I can’t really (predict).”

The research was published online Thursday in the journal Current Biology.

 ??  ?? Hendrik Poinar, director of McMaster University’s Ancient DNA Centre, says ‘recreating’ the woolly mammoth could be a reality within decades.
Hendrik Poinar, director of McMaster University’s Ancient DNA Centre, says ‘recreating’ the woolly mammoth could be a reality within decades.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada