Vancouver Sun

Apples and oranges?

Powerful lessons: B.C. must heed California’s drought and groundwate­r law reform — and act now

- RANDY CHRISTENSE­N AND OLIVER M. BRANDES Randy Christense­n is a lawyer with Ecojustice and a Research Associate with the University of Victoria’s POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. Oliver M. Brandes is the Co-Director of the POLIS Project on Ecologica

Drought can be scary, and there’s no doubt that recent news about the potentiall­y cataclysmi­c drought in California makes us all uneasy. In some towns, wells have run dry. Water deliveries to California’s globally important agricultur­e industry have been cut back or cut off. Winter snowpack was virtually non-existent this year. And many cities will have to cut water use by as much as a one-third.

California dreaming has become California drying.

One consequenc­e is the unpreceden­ted rates at which groundwate­r is being pumped and wells are being drilled. Groundwate­r has long been California’s safety net in times of drought, but so much groundwate­r has been taken that land is sinking under people’s feet and aquifers are at serious risk of being depleted (if they aren’t already).

Worse, up until last year, when and where wells were drilled and how much could be pumped from them was basically unregulate­d in most of California. Can B.C. learn from this? Prior to last year, B.C. also did not regulate its groundwate­r. In 2014, B.C. and California passed the Water Sustainabi­lity Act and the Sustainabl­e Groundwate­r Management Act respective­ly. B.C.’s act is not yet in force, but will be soon.

Both B.C. and California have envisioned systems where water sustainabi­lity is key and significan­t responsibi­lity for preventing and addressing water crises would potentiall­y reside locally through planning and delegation processes. A relatively novel approach in B.C., California’s experience offers some valuable lessons. They’re the focus of the new report “California’s Oranges and B.C.’s Apples? Lessons for B.C. from California Groundwate­r Reform” released this week by the University of Victoria’s POLIS Project and Ecojustice.

California’s local agencies have roughly 20 years of experience with voluntary, non- binding groundwate­r planning. Developing binding plans to achieve sustainabi­lity will take a further five years and another 20 to implement. Yes, California’s fasttrack, historic drought response will take until 2040 to achieve results urgently needed now.

The big insight for B.C. is that local planning and control are important, but they can take decades. So, it’s critical that local groundwate­r planning in B.C. starts now, even though it’s not yet required in the new legislatio­n.

Second, voluntary programs simply are not good enough when water supplies really start to run out. Starting in the 1990s, California encouraged local planning exercises to protect groundwate­r. There was no requiremen­t to actually stick to these plans, but it was thought that the knowledge gained through the exercise would carry over to decision-making and management. While some successful examples exist, this approach is generally ineffectiv­e on a wider scale. Under California’s new law, local authoritie­s must now create binding plans.

In B.C., the new act is set up in a way where these kinds of plans will only occur on an ad hoc, discretion­ary basis. If California’s experience is anything to go by, this will likely be too little too late for any of the real challenges — regional drought or flooding — that B.C. is likely to face.

Third, beyond the requiremen­t for binding plans, not just any old plan will do. Plans must achieve some minimum performanc­e standards. California has now written these types of standards into law, and the ‘sustainabl­e’ in its Sustainabl­e Groundwate­r Management Act is defined to include things like preventing the depletion of aquifers, water quality deteriorat­ion, salt water intrusion, land subsidence, and negative impacts on other beneficial uses.

B.C. has passed its Water Sustainabi­lity Act, but has not yet defined what constitute­s sustainabi­lity. The legislatio­n does have some potentiall­y powerful provisions to ensure environmen­tal flows (the critical water levels needed to keep fish and ecosystems healthy, including groundwate­r inflows to streams). But, until specific details are articulate­d in the act’s regulation­s there is no way of knowing how effective this safety net will be.

There is a lot to commend in B.C.’s new legislatio­n, but there is a risk of repeating some of California’s mistakes by not being clear, comprehens­ive, and insistent that water resources be protected. We must start before the crisis is upon us: Water planning in the midst of a flood or drought will set us up for bad and ineffectiv­e plans.

The good news is it’s not too late. Over the next few years, B.C. will be developing the necessary regulation­s to create and enforce measures that are desperatel­y needed to protect our water. So, let’s do it right with a healthy dose of prevention and precaution. The lesson from California is that we can avoid its errors and benefit from its successes but, as a province, we must act now. When a water crisis hits, it will already be too late.

 ?? RICH PEDRONCELL­I/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? The authors say lessons from California’s drought, an example of which is this photo of a dried irrigation canal near Stockton, must be learned in B.C. if the province is to avoid its own serious water crisis.
RICH PEDRONCELL­I/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES The authors say lessons from California’s drought, an example of which is this photo of a dried irrigation canal near Stockton, must be learned in B.C. if the province is to avoid its own serious water crisis.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada