Confusion slowed fuel spill response

Response delayed nearly two hours, review says

Misunderstandings, uncertainty and technical difficulties slowed the emergency response to a toxic fuel spill in English Bay by nearly two hours, a review has found.

The review released Friday also found that Canadian Coast Guard staff were unsure of their roles and a faulty provincial alert system meant the city was not notified until 12 hours later.

“The MV Marathassa incident was an operational discharge of a persistent fuel oil with high consequences,” said report author John Butler. “The response was delayed by one hour and 49 minutes due to confusion of roles and responsibilities, miscommunications and technology issues.”

The report was commissioned by the coast guard after a malfunction on the grain carrier caused about 2,700 litres of bunker fuel to spill into the bay on April 8.

Butler, a former coast guard assistant commissioner, conducted the review and made 25 recommendations on how future marine spills could be handled differently.

He detailed a string of misunderstandings between the coast guard, Port Metro Vancouver and the organization tasked with cleanup, the Western Canada Marine Response Corp.

A passing sailboat reported the spill at 4:48 p.m. Soon after, port officials contacted the coast guard, which gave a “heads up” to the response corporation at 6:08 p.m., said Butler.

But the coast guard did not officially activate the corporation until 7:57 p.m., meaning cleanup was delayed by one hour and 49 minutes, according to Butler.

The delay appears to have stemmed from a conversation between Port Metro Vancouver and the response corporation at 7 p.m. Port officials said they couldn’t see the original patch of oil and were collecting a sample kit.

“The response organization incorrectly believed that the Port Metro vessel was standing down,” Butler said at a news conference. “This information was then communicated to the coast guard, leading to a de-escalation of the event.”

Thirty minutes later, port officials received additional air surveillance photos that clearly showed the significance of the spill. But due to problems connecting with the coast guard via cellphone and computer, they weren’t shared until 7:55 p.m.

As soon as coast guard staff saw the photos, they alerted the response corporation, he said.

The coast guard lacked the capacity to respond because many workers were just demobilizing from an operation in the Grenville Channel at the time. Butler called for the agency to ensure it always has enough staff to respond to a major marinepollution incident.

Butler’s report also said that front- line coast guard staff were not aware of a long-standing agreement with Port Metro Vancouver that clearly sets out responsibilities, blaming high turnover and poor training for the oversight.

“We know we must prevent such a delay from recurring. A critical piece to addressing the delay is clearly in the area of communications,” coast guard commissioner Jody Thomas said.

Further, Butler said the owners of the MV Marathassa’s denial that the vessel was leaking fuel delayed recognition of the spill’s magnitude. Alassia NewShips Management, which operates the Greece-registered ship, said that it will be reviewing the report fully and it remains focused on cleanup and response.

An investigation by Transport Canada into the cause of the leak is still underway.