Vancouver Sun

Educationa­l focus on fads doesn’t add up

Our children need fundamenta­ls, not the latest gimmick, Tara Houle writes.

- Tara Houle is a parent advocate and founder of WISEMathBC.

Recently, my daughter’s dance studio did something revolution­ary — they adopted an exam system for their pupils. Their reasoning was shocking: To ensure their student’s progress in a more meaningful manner, rigorous practice and assessment would be required, both for their instructor­s and their students. In short, students would be trained properly under the watchful eye of their knowledgea­ble instructor­s, and then be held accountabl­e to demonstrat­e their understand­ing by attending exam preparatio­n sessions and a final exam. These students are in good hands.

Unfortunat­ely, this same attention to detail isn’t happening in today’s math classrooms. Ample evidence illustrate­s there has been a significan­t decline in our students’ math performanc­e over the past 15 years, and we also know the percentage of our top math students has fallen dramatical­ly. Tutoring rates have recently skyrockete­d, as parents are now scrambling to ensure their kids learn the fundamenta­ls properly — something lacking in today’s classrooms.

This spike in enrolment correlates with an increased use of problem-based learning in our schools. Yet education leaders don’t want to acknowledg­e the tutoring phenomenon. Are our ministry officials afraid of what they might find?

Let’s compare for a moment the methods that are now being emphasized in comparison to what once was the standard. Today, we have manipulati­ves such as fraction strips as opposed to learning fractional arithmetic, explaining one’s work rather than adding and subtractin­g in columns, creating multiple strategies to write addition and subtractio­n sentences, and the use of calculator­s as early as Grade 2. There is little emphasis on mastering any arithmetic procedure, let alone ensuring kids memorize their multiplica­tion tables. Unfortunat­ely, these glaring deficienci­es underlie a much bigger problem with math education in this province. With all the millions of taxpayer dollars spent on a new curriculum, very little attention has been given to the cognitive evidence behind effective math instructio­n, leaving kids frustrated and teachers exasperate­d. What, exactly, are we paying for?

A review of the curricula and textbooks used in B.C. over the past 125 years raises serious questions about the Education Ministry’s new direction. The familiar refrain of how the world is changing and the requiremen­t to break the factory school model is as relevant now as it was in 1895. But what has changed is the content and the methods for teaching our kids.

Previous lessons were rigorous, and they provided ample practice time and classroom guidance to ensure all kids had the opportunit­y to learn fundamenta­ls. In contrast, today’s resources, such as Math Makes Sense, are chaotic in design, offer very few challengin­g problems for students to solve, and support an increased dependence on calculator­s and manipulati­ves. Math Makes Sense is also riddled with errors and inaccuraci­es, yet the ministry continues to endorse this textbook for classroom instructio­n.

Even scarier are rumours that textbooks don’t have to be used in conjunctio­n with the new education plan. Instead of rigorous standards, educators will be encouraged to use whatever resources they want, most of which will be based on the hyped-up progressiv­e fads that education consultant­s promote at BCTF-sponsored workshops. Those teachers who try to use successful, straightfo­rward methods are labelled dinosaurs, and some have been shuffled out of their districts for refusing to conform.

If we truly want to ensure our kids have a bright future, we must first build on the successes of the past and bring that forward for them. That has not happened here. Successful methods of teaching mathematic­s have been eradicated in B.C. classrooms. There is a rabid fervour promoting 21st-century learning, and insisting that inquiry-based learning take precedence over everything else.

However, the basic fundamenta­l principles of arithmetic are non-negotiable. Without establishi­ng a strong foundation at the elementary level, any attempts at Math 10, pre-calculus or entry-level university mathematic­s will end in failure. If we allow our education leaders to bury the past, these successful methods will cease to exist. Our two-tier education system has been created by their inability to acknowledg­e best practices. Send them your tutoring bills (or send them to your MLA). It’s time they acknowledg­e the mess they’ve created.

Today’s resources, such as Math Makes Sense, are chaotic in design, offer very few challengin­g problems for students to solve, and support an increased dependence on calculator­s and manipulati­ves. Tara Houle, WISEMathBC founder

 ??  ?? B.C.’s current math curriculum emphasizes the use of calculator­s over things like memorizing multiplica­tion tables.
B.C.’s current math curriculum emphasizes the use of calculator­s over things like memorizing multiplica­tion tables.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada