Vancouver Sun

FOREIGN-BUYER TAX GETS A TWEAK, BUT AFFORDABIL­ITY STILL ELUSIVE

- ROB SHAW

B.C.’s finance minister will unveil new exemptions and rebates for the foreign-buyer tax on Metro Vancouver real estate this week.

Internatio­nal citizens with work permits who pay taxes in B.C. won’t have to pay the foreign-buyer surcharge. That’s part of a bid to recruit high-tech workers from the United States. And foreign nationals who were hit with the 15 per cent foreign-buyer tax on their real estate, but then months later became Canadian citizens, could get a rebate.

But if you think the changes are an acknowledg­ment from the Liberals that the bombshell tax on foreigners last year was crafted too hastily, reached too far, had too many unintended consequenc­es or did too little to fix home prices in the region, well, think again.

“The tax on foreign purchasers in British Columbia has done exactly what the government and what citizens hoped it would do, and that is slow down the tremendous growth in the cost of housing in the Lower Mainland,” Premier Christy Clark declared in the legislatur­e last week.

“We did it. The NDP opposed it. It turned out that it did exactly what we expected it would do.”

“I know the foreign tax was not popular with developers,” she added later in the house. “But I do know that it’s popular with British Columbians … It’s been popular because it works.”

In other words, unfurl a “Mission Accomplish­ed” banner.

Yet despite the premier’s enthusiast­ic rhetoric, the housing affordabil­ity crisis appears very much alive in the Lower Mainland.

The foreign-buyer tax served to vent the public’s frustratio­n with a small subset of the problem — mainly wealthy offshore Chinese investors who didn’t pay taxes here — but it doesn’t appear to have addressed the root of the issues that drove two years of skyrocketi­ng home prices.

Whether that actually matters in the minds of voters on May 9 is an open question.

This week’s tax exemptions will mark one of the last tweaks to the government’s suite of housing reforms before it heads into the election campaign. After first refusing to intervene a year ago, the Liberals have since stripped realtors of their self-policing powers, pledged $500 million in new affordable housing constructi­on, banned shadowflip­ping of properties, created a government-backed down payment loan program, and offered municipali­ties cash incentives to clear a backlog of approvals for housing projects.

The overall goal, the premier has said, is that “home ownership must stay within the reach of the middle class.”

But on that promise, she’s failed, NDP critic David Eby said.

“I don’t know what planet the premier is on if she thinks she’s dealt with housing affordabil­ity in Metro Vancouver,” Eby said.

“The prices for housing are just as out of reach for people as they were before the foreign-buyer tax. What she’s done successful­ly is stall the market.

“We should have been having these discussion­s about the housing market more than two years ago. During those two years that government was in total denial about what was happening on our housing market, the average detached home went up $600,000. And that’s put those homes out of the reach of literally thousands of families.”

The tax plunged the number of foreign purchasers from 13.2 per cent of total sales in June to four per cent in December. Parts of the market have cooled, mainly high-end detached homes. But overall sales prices haven’t fallen as dramatical­ly. In fact, condo prices continue to increase.

There’s no shortage of additional tax reforms the province could pursue to “finally get serious about Metro Vancouver’s housing crisis,” as my colleague Douglas Todd outlined recently. Ottawa’s tightened mortgage rules also likely had an impact.

Yet politicall­y, 57 days before an election, Clark’s Liberals are likely pretty happy with where they sit on the housing issue.

A problem that a year ago looked like it could define the campaign has diffused to the point the Opposition NDP barely mentioned it during the spring session, instead focusing its attacks on Liberal fundraisin­g.

Ontario is now considerin­g following B.C.’s lead with its own foreign-buyer tax.

“There was a lot of anger and politicall­y, yes, it stopped that anger,” said Anne McMullin, president of the Urban Developmen­t Institute. “We were all blaming this kind of bogeyman.”

B.C. should instead be focusing on faster local developmen­t approvals, better land-use density and other reforms to boost the supply of housing, McMullin said.

“We don’t tax our way out of the affordabil­ity issue,” she said.

Better solutions for voters to consider May 9 are much more complex than just taxing foreigners, University of B.C. business professor Thomas Davidoff said.

“To the extent the foreignbuy­er tax doesn’t get us to affordabil­ity, and it doesn’t look like it is (getting) us there, you have to think about things like up-zoning, which is politicall­y nuanced,” he said.

The province should force municipali­ties to rezone singlefami­ly neighbourh­oods for higher density townhomes, condos and apartments, Davidoff said.

“But nobody running for office wants to say, ‘Hey, we are going to force municipali­ties to upzone,’” Davidoff said. “That’s the political challenge.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? David Eby
David Eby
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada