Vancouver Sun

Witty, not woke

Bond fans want humour and seduction, not brutal correctnes­s,

- Madeline Grant says.

Who is your favourite Bond? I’d hazard that your choice says something about you. Traditiona­lists plump for Sean Connery, while those of an edgy or progressiv­e bent favour Daniel Craig. One colleague argues persuasive­ly for George Lazenby, proving that we humans are indeed a diverse bunch. (Being immature, with a weakness for puns and a well-cocked eyebrow, mine is Roger Moore).

The magazine Radio Times aims to set the record straight, polling tens of thousands of readers in a knockout tournament between the six actors who have graced the role. The results are fascinatin­g. Connery finishes top — no surprises there. Intriguing­ly, Timothy Dalton’s gritty, criminally underrated Bond ends up in second place, ahead of Pierce Brosnan and Roger Moore. Daniel Craig was eliminated immediatel­y.

This seems quite the upset when you consider that not long ago, many critics were hailing Craig as the greatest ever Bond. Yet his films have never recaptured the high watermark of his debut in Casino Royale, directed by Martin Campbell, the architect of another game-changing reboot, Goldeneye. The series soon turned in a worthier and more tedious direction, axing much of what was distinctiv­ely “Bond.” Gadgets, sexual chemistry — and yes, smutty wordplay — were replaced with bewilderin­gly fast-moving action sequences and CGI. Then the ultimate sacrilege: Bond’s trademark martini was supplanted in one scene by a Heineken bottle, amid so much product placement I almost wondered when they would start calling him “007UP.” There are constant efforts to unearth deeper emotional meaning from Bond, exposing him as a tortured white elephant of “toxic masculinit­y,” rather than the elegant, seductive gentleman spy. This perhaps explains recent films’ obsession with Bond’s origins, reflecting our own identitari­an times. The result may be more multi-faceted than, say, A View to a Kill, but it eliminates much of the fun. Only the most committed fan would return for Round 2 of Quantum of Solace.

I suspect many of the Craig enthusiast­s aren’t great lovers of the franchise. They are more likely to be scholarly critics, the perenniall­y woke, or else they like him because he is more Bourne than Bond. Over the weekend, Dad and I watched Moonraker, one of the sillier Moore outings. We groaned as Bond tried to remain incognito among the sightseers of Venice by driving through St Mark’s Square on a hovercraft-gondola mounted on a giant Union Jack, while waiters spilled drinks and a pigeon did a double-take. We cheered as the defence minister, upon spotting the obligatory footage of Bond and his love interest in intergalac­tic flagrante, said: “My God, what’s Bond doing?”

To which Q responds: “I think he’s attempting re-entry, sir.” Bond is nothing without this element of prep-school humour.

 ?? MGM ?? Daniel Craig’s James Bond is more Jason Bourne than 007.
MGM Daniel Craig’s James Bond is more Jason Bourne than 007.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada