Vancouver Sun

MOMENTS OF TRUTH

Jerrod Carmichael Reality Show is a riveting — and risky — experiment

- LILI LOOFBOUROW

Jerrod Carmichael Reality Show Crave

Jerrod Carmichael is exhausting.

That's not a condemnati­on. It's the hypothesis being tested by Jerrod Carmichael Reality Show, Max's experiment­al and frequently unflatteri­ng docuseries in which the charismati­c comedian, actor and director embarks on a quest for something like radical honesty by living his life (largely) on camera. “Cameras make me feel more comfortabl­e,” Carmichael says in the first episode as he stares directly into one. “I like this. It feels permanent and it feels really dumb to lie. I keep saying I want to live more truthfully and I find myself alone a lot and I can't tell if it's because I'm telling the truth.”

An alert from the Grindr app interrupts this meditation on permanence, solitude and what truth-telling might have cost him. Carmichael's focus drifts. He looks at his phone. “Whoa,” he says at what he finds there, fully derailed.

That wry little scene doubles as a demonstrat­ion of how perfect fidelity to the truth can produce anticlimax instead of the epiphanies and breakthrou­ghs for which Carmichael longs. It's dull to watch a person vanish into their phone. It is, however, inarguably “honest:” This is indeed how we live. That authentici­ty isn't always entertaini­ng — or cathartic — becomes one of the problems the series tries to solve. The lesson here, if there is one, is that Carmichael's first real encounter with himself yields the opposite of self-discovery. What we observe instead is an ambitious and charming but flawed (and horny) human getting distracted, by a stranger on his phone, from his own mission statement.

As confession­al television, the scene is a cheeky failure, albeit one containing some clues about how Carmichael's theories about the examined life might fare when put into practice. In front of cameras. For TV.

The first episode picks up in the immediate aftermath of Carmichael's Emmy-winning special Rothaniel, in which he comes out as gay in the course of processing his father's infidelity and his frustratio­n at his mother's unwillingn­ess to hold him accountabl­e. He's famous, rich and joyfully, unapologet­ically sexual, but he's also feeling disconnect­ed and lonely. Some threads the series takes up are new: Getting ghosted after confessing his feelings to someone. His own shortcomin­gs as a friend. A well-meaning but possibly misguided effort to coach a fellow comedian into embracing a process more like his own.

Other topics will be familiar to Carmichael fans, including his newly strained relationsh­ip with Cynthia, his extremely religious mother (who believes homosexual­ity is a sin) and his well-documented anger at his father. That the latter has fuelled much of Carmichael's work puts a curious spin on some of the newer material; in particular, a storyline in which Carmichael searches for love, finds a kind and supportive boyfriend and then repeatedly cheats on him — sometimes immediatel­y after a counsellin­g session.

The backdrop to all this is, of course, Carmichael's evolving relationsh­ip to his family. Reeling from the irony that the disclosure­s that earned him accolades have also cost him the bond he and his mother once shared, he brings her up constantly in interviews, pointing out that she might be watching. Cynthia looms over the whole enterprise as its true intended audience. We, the viewers, are a pretext. And an excuse to misbehave.

Carmichael's other target has always been, and continues to be, his father — from whom he wants something like the Platonic ideal of a conversati­on, one that will transcend their history, retroactiv­ely heal his mother and leave him feeling satisfied and respected, with his questions answered and psychic wounds salved by the kind of full, sincere apology that makes forgivenes­s possible.

The show snaps into savage focus, therefore, whenever either parent is on-screen. Neither can live up (or down) to the outsized place they occupy in Carmichael's standup, or philosophy, or heart. They're homophobic, certainly. Also soft-spoken, polite and out of their depth. They are, in their own way, trying. One can't help but feel for them when Carmichael pressures them for a heartfelt and authentic encounter while strangers shove his show's cameras into their faces to capture their reactions.

That was never going to work, but the confrontat­ions are neverthele­ss fascinatin­g to watch. So are the show's nerdier reflection­s on the camera's changing role. Carmichael's early shorthand for this project (“I'm trying to self-Truman Show,” he says at one point, referencin­g the 1998 film starring Jim Carrey) registers a desire not just to live more truthfully but also to generate a transparen­t record of the attempt.

Carmichael's buoyancy and openness save the show from feeling dour or hopeless. The fits of conscience that anchor a series notable for its moral and artistic ambition can't get too precious or navel-gazey; they're constantly tempered and undercut by the comic's equally formidable sense of play. Jerrod Carmichael Reality Show peaks when it leans into those maddening human paradoxes.

The Washington Post

 ?? HBO ?? Comic Jerrod Carmichael lives his life largely on camera in his new reality series, which covers the usual ground familiar to his fans.
HBO Comic Jerrod Carmichael lives his life largely on camera in his new reality series, which covers the usual ground familiar to his fans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada