Vancouver Sun

B.C. United walks right into trap set by B.C. Conservati­ve leader

Forced recorded vote on bill dealing with transgende­r athletes in sports

- VAUGHN PALMER vpalmer@postmedia.com

The B.C. legislatur­e convened Tuesday morning with B.C. Conservati­ve Leader John Rustad setting a trap for his rivals in B.C. United. Before long, United walked right into it, while the governing New Democrats looked on with glee.

It started with an unusual procedural motion. The Conservati­ves called for a recorded vote on the introducto­ry reading of a proposed clean energy bill from the B.C. Greens.

First reading, as it is known, is almost always automatic. The bill will be added to the legislativ­e agenda on a voice vote as a courtesy, even though bills from the opposition parties hardly ever make it beyond that stage.

But in this case Bruce Banman, the house leader of the Conservati­ves, called “division,” obliging the legislatur­e clerks to record the vote on a member-by-member basis.

Straightaw­ay the division bells were rung, summoning all MLAs to the chamber for the recorded vote.

The reasoning behind the move was not readily apparent. Green Leader Sonia Furstenau, who introduced the clean energy bill, threw up her hands in bewilderme­nt.

The mystery was compounded when the vote itself was taken and the B.C. Conservati­ves joined the other members of the house in allowing the bill to proceed. “Nemine contradice­nte,” announced the clerk of the legislatur­e, Kate Ryan-Lloyd, invoking the procedural Latin for “unanimous.”

So the B.C. Conservati­ves called for a rare, recorded vote on first reading, then joined the other members of the house to support passage. Looking on from my seat in the gallery behind the Speaker, damned if I could figure out what was up.

Then Mike Farnworth, veteran NDP MLA and cabinet minister, caught my eye from where he was sitting on the government side and mouthed the words: “Wait for the next move.”

Sure enough Rustad was on his feet straightaw­ay, moving first reading on a bill of his own. As he explained later, the Conservati­ves called for a recorded vote on the Green bill so as to get all MLAs into the house and discover where they stood on his bill.

Rustad's proposed Fairness in Women's and Girls' Sports Act was provocativ­e and intended as such, seeing as it targeted transgende­r athletes.

“This bill provides that sports and athletic teams, events and tournament­s that are publicly funded must be classified by sex, and it limits participat­ion to participan­ts of the biological sex that correspond­s to the sex classifica­tion,” said Rustad.

“The Conservati­ve party finds that requiring the designatio­n of separate sex, specific athlete teams or sports is vital in order to maintain the fairness for women and girls' athletic opportunit­ies in B.C.

“I would urge all members of this house to vote in support of this legislatio­n,” Rustad concluded, knowing that was unlikely to happen.

His game was evident. He wanted B.C. United to declare itself for or against his bill. If for, they would be following in his wake as they have done other times recently. If against, they would be on the other side of a wedge dividing right-of-centre voters.

Again division was called, and snap went the trap.

The New Democrats were scarcely disinteres­ted observers in this showdown. NDP house leader Ravi Kahlon strode up and down the government benches, advising his members to disregard the usual courtesy of approving first reading, and instead vote against the bill on principle.

The two Green MLAs briefly left the chamber for a consultati­on, then came back to vote against the Conservati­ve bill as well.

They were joined by Selina Robinson and Adam Walker, the two ex-NDP MLAs now sitting as independen­ts.

The B.C. United members voted with the Conservati­ves, albeit looking somewhat glum at having been forced into this position.

The tally was 27 in favour of first reading, 51 against.

It was the first time a bill had been denied the courtesy of approval on first reading since 2017, when the New Democrats and Greens joined in delivering a coup de grace to Christy Clark's dying B.C. Liberal government.

For Clark, those votes were unavoidabl­e, being preludes to the confidence vote that ended her days as premier. That wasn't the case on Tuesday.

The B.C. United members could simply have walked out in protest, signalling they had no intention of participat­ing in a charade orchestrat­ed by the Conservati­ves with the help of the New Democrats.

However, they remained at their posts.

B.C. United House leader Todd Stone denied my suggestion that he and his members had walked into a trap set by Rustad. He said his members voted for first reading out of respect for standard procedure in the house.

Their vote to allow the bill to proceed to the next stage was no different from their acquiescen­ce on any number of government bills that they have no intention of supporting in the later stages of debate.

Rustad, riding higher in the opinion polls than B.C. United, had another good day. His former colleagues appear to be spooked by him and he knows it.

As for the New Democrats, they are doubtless working up an attack ad that will portray B.C. United and the Conservati­ves as right-wing mirror images of each other.

 ?? THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Conservati­ve house leader Bruce Banman called “division” that brought all members to a recorded vote in the house, helping set up a situation where B.C. United had to vote on a transgende­r bill.
THE CANADIAN PRESS Conservati­ve house leader Bruce Banman called “division” that brought all members to a recorded vote in the house, helping set up a situation where B.C. United had to vote on a transgende­r bill.
 ?? GERRY KAHRMANN FILES ?? B.C. United house leader Todd Stone denied that he and his members had walked into a trap set by B.C. Conservati­ve Leader John Rustad on a rare, recorded vote on first reading.
GERRY KAHRMANN FILES B.C. United house leader Todd Stone denied that he and his members had walked into a trap set by B.C. Conservati­ve Leader John Rustad on a rare, recorded vote on first reading.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada