Waterloo Region Record

Ignoring the crisis in journalism

- Sara Bannerman Sara Bannerman is associate professor and Canada Research Chair in Communicat­ion Policy and Governance at McMaster University in Hamilton. This article was originally published on The Conversati­on. Disclosure informatio­n is available on the

Although we now live in a vast internet landscape with immense amounts of content, the diversity and quality of the news media we consume continues to be a concern. Large sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Google should not be trusted to solve these problems.

Internet news platforms have contribute­d to the closure of traditiona­l news outlets that are the source of much of the quality news consumed online. The internet has facilitate­d the rise to dominance of a few global mega-platforms. Some of these platforms encourage click bait — stories with enticing headlines and no substance. They create filter bubbles that discourage access to multiple perspectiv­es.

Unfortunat­ely, the Canadian government’s new cultural policy, the Creative Canada Policy Framework, does not adequately address these concerns. The framework, issued by Canadian Heritage, calls support for local news production a “pillar” of its plan, acknowledg­ing challenges within the “traditiona­l news ecosystem.”

Yet the framework offers virtually no new support to Canadian news production, one of the most important and most threatened foundation­s of Canadian democracy. In a speech announcing the new policy, Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly said the Liberal government has no plan “to bail out industry models that are no longer viable.” This lack of support for news production is the framework’s most disastrous failing.

While the government has recently made a commitment to increase funding to the CBC, the Creative Canada framework dedicates no new funding for Canadian local news, despite urgent recommenda­tions by the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage in June and the Public Policy Forum in February.

There will be no new funding to the Canadian Periodical Fund to support Canadian newspapers, though the framework suggests expanding the program’s eligibilit­y criteria. Expanding eligibilit­y criteria, with no additional funds, could mean less funding per publicatio­n. Further, the eligibilit­y criteria are not expanded to permit daily newspapers to qualify, despite the recommenda­tion made by the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage in June to expand the fund to daily newspapers.

Rather than providing a way forward, the Liberal government suggests Facebook, Twitter and Google will “jump-start digital news innovation.” The efforts of these organizati­ons in the realm of news have, to date, been widely criticized for spreading fake news, soaking up advertisin­g dollars that once supported news production, and permitting unsavoury ad targeting.

Furthermor­e, Facebook’s founder does not accept that Facebook is a media company. Creative Canada’s reliance on social media companies to solve the problems facing the news industry is woefully misplaced.

With appropriat­e interventi­ons and support, the internet could be a tremendous force for content diversific­ation in news and other media. However, those recent recommenda­tions made by the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage and the Public Policy Forum have been ignored or rejected by the government in this new policy framework.

Some of these recommenda­tions included: A Future of Journalism and Democracy Fund; an expansion of the funding categories within the Canadian Periodical Fund to include daily and free community newspapers; greater emphasis on CBC’s news and informatio­n functions; a recommenda­tion to publish CBC content on Creative Commons licences, opening the content to other news organizati­ons; a CRTC review to encourage greater monitoring of local news production requiremen­ts; the incorporat­ion of a “diversity of voices” test to ensure media mergers do not eliminate media competitio­n in the Competitio­n Act; and the applicatio­n of ethics guidelines and press councils to digital media.

The policy does makes commitment­s to women-directed production­s. As well, the government has plans to invest in Indigenous creators. The creation of an Indigenous Screen Office in June and new training by the CBC to encourage Indigenous voices point to positive changes.

Fortunatel­y, there are several opportunit­ies in the near future for the Canadian government. Creative Canada suggests more announceme­nts may be made regarding the Canadian Periodical Fund in 2018. The federal government’s review of the Broadcasti­ng Act and Telecommun­ications Act could provide another opportunit­y to put recommenda­tions regarding the CBC and the CRTC into action, strengthen­ing its “pillar” of support for Canadian news.

 ?? ADRIAN WYLD, THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Heritage Minister Melanie Joly has said the Liberal government has no plan “to bail out industry models that are no longer viable.” This lack of support for news production is the framework’s most disastrous failing, writes Sara Bannerman.
ADRIAN WYLD, THE CANADIAN PRESS Heritage Minister Melanie Joly has said the Liberal government has no plan “to bail out industry models that are no longer viable.” This lack of support for news production is the framework’s most disastrous failing, writes Sara Bannerman.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada