Waterloo Region Record

Appeal Court overturns costs award against local lawyer

- Gordon Paul, Record staff

KITCHENER — Ontario’s highest court has overturned a judge’s ruling ordering a Waterloo lawyer to pay $100,000.

Brigitte Gratl, who represente­d a mother whose daughter was made a Crown ward, was previously ordered to pay $50,000 to both the Ontario Legal Aid Plan and another lawyer who later represente­d the mother.

The costs were ordered in an appeal presided over by a Superior Court judge in Kitchener, Justice Grant Campbell, who had called Gratl’s conduct “inexcusabl­e and reprehensi­ble.”

Gratl appealed the findings of ineffectiv­e assistance and the costs award against her. Last week, the Ontario Court of Appeal allowed Gratl’s appeal, overturnin­g the findings.

The case involves a 10-year-old girl who was made a Crown ward. An initial ruling in 2015 by Justice Paddy Hardman cancelled the mother’s access to her daughter.

In an appeal by the biological parents, paid for by legal aid, Gratl “declined, refused or otherwise ignored” the mother’s plea to bring a motion reinstatin­g access, Campbell said.

The judge went on to say Gratl caused “an unnecessar­y duplicatio­n of effort of counsel, unnecessar­y extra court attendance­s and a significan­t consumptio­n of court and counsel’s resources and taxpayer funding.”

Campbell found no error in Hardman’s determinat­ion of access but “nonetheles­s ordered access,” Justice Mary Lou Benotto wrote in a unanimous decision by the Appeal Court wrote.

“Having found no error on the part of the trial judge, the issue of ineffectiv­e assistance was moot,” she wrote. “Ineffectiv­e assistance of counsel as a ground of appeal has a very narrow applicatio­n.

“It is not a springboar­d from which an appellate court engages in a retrospect­ive analysis of every aspect of a lawyer’s conduct. The far-reaching analysis in which the appeal judge engaged is more properly done in the context of a civil negligence action, with all of its procedural safeguards, or a disciplina­ry investigat­ion by the Law Society of Upper Canada.”

The Appeal Court restored the trial judge’s order of no access to the child.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada