Waterloo Region Record

The case for closing or selling off Via Rail

- IAN MADSEN IAN MADSEN IS A SENIOR POLICY ANALYST AT THE FRONTIER CENTRE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND AUTHOR OF THE FORTHCOMIN­G “SELL THEM OR SHUT THEM DOWN: 111 REASONS GOVERNMENT­S SHOULD DIVEST STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISE­S.” © TROY MEDIA

Investment managers and investors should often ask: if I didn’t already own this stock, would I buy it today?

By any criteria, Via Rail, a federal Crown corporatio­n, is not a good investment — even under unrealisti­cally favourable assumption­s. The federal government should rigorously examine this charitably-designated “enterprise,” then aim it toward one of two fates: sale or liquidatio­n.

Via Rail’s chronic cash-burning condition offers no economic value to any potential buyer, though there are always contrarian­s with the confidence, and perhaps the capability, to turn a seemingly hopeless asset into something valuable. For example, a number of ailing airlines have been bought and sold. But Via Rail, as structured and priced, has little allure to potential free-enterprise buyers.

Operating and capital funding from the federal government for Via has been massive: $548 million in 2019 (before the impact of COVID-19) and $597 million in 2021, as examples. Sadly, we should expect that massive financial support to continue.

The government should hire management consulting and investment banking firms to review and value Via Rail. By employing a variety of scenarios, including modelling fundamenta­l changes in Via’s orientatio­n, routes and staff levels, an engaged outside consultant should seek out opportunit­ies for Via to move toward future positive cash flow.

Any genuinely independen­t review by experts would likely conclude that Via Rail requires additional investment and radical modernizat­ion — if it is not merely to survive but thrive.

The subsidy per passenger for Via’s Corridor (Quebec to Windsor) route was $180 in 2021. In 2019, before COVID-19, the subsidy per rider was only $80. The subsidy for each rider taking Via’s spectacula­r JasperPrin­ce Rupert route in 2019 was $483. In 2021, during COVID, that subsidy hit $1,474.

Higher ridership alone wouldn’t eliminate the subsidies.

In the absence of imaginativ­e, radical and, perhaps, ruthless restructur­ing and reorientat­ion, it’s unlikely that convention­al investor valuation metrics (such as enterprise value to revenue; enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciati­on and amortizati­on, price to earnings, price to operating cash flow, price to free cash flow, and or even price to net asset value) would generate a visible potential value for even the most optimistic of potential buyers.

Yet, stranger things have happened, with seemingly unappealin­g assets snapped up by a strategic industrysa­vvy acquirer.

Taxpayers will never know unless the federal government puts Via Rail up for sale (either in its current state, imperfecti­ons and all or after a credible restructur­ing plan is produced).

The federal government should embark on setting Via Rail, a truly underperfo­rming asset, on either a sale or liquidatio­n track. Using the cost of federal debt, the present value of Via Rail is about negative $16 billion.

There must be a better use of taxpayers’ money than keeping Via Rail, a chronicall­y bad investment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada