Windsor Star

Privacy czar criticizes secrecy around facilities that offer assisted dying

- JESSICA SMITH CROSS

TORONTO Ontario’s privacy commission­er is calling on the provincial government to make informatio­n identifyin­g publicly funded facilities that provide medically assisted deaths available to members of the public who request it under the freedom-of-informatio­n system.

Brian Beamish says legislatio­n passed this spring shields hospitals, long-term care homes and hospices from Ontario’s freedomof-informatio­n law, allowing them to refuse to disclose any informatio­n that would reveal whether or not they grant patients’ requests for medical assistance in dying.

While the government says that was done to protect the safety of clinicians in those facilities, Beamish says there’s no proof opponents of assisted dying would pose any threat to them if the facilities were identified.

The new legislatio­n also allows the government and facilities to choose not to disclose which individual physicians perform medically assisted dying. Beamish is not calling for that to be changed, but he says protecting facilities as a whole goes too far.

Ontario medical facilities are not required to provide medical assistance in dying and some, particular­ly religious institutio­ns, have decided not to do so on grounds of conscience.

Beamish says patients may want informatio­n about facilities that do and do not provide the service when choosing where to access medical care. He says that informatio­n is important to the broader civic debate about the assisted death.

“We believe that excluding informatio­n that could identify facilities providing such services is inconsiste­nt with Ontario’s access and privacy laws and would hinder the transparen­cy and accountabi­lity of Ontario’s health system,” Beamish wrote in his annual report, released this week.

The government has no plans to change the law on the matter, according to a spokeswoma­n in the health minister’s office, who said the decision to shield medical facilities under freedom-ofinformat­ion laws was made after clinicians expressed “concerns about the potential consequenc­es of participat­ing in medical assistance in dying.”

Beamish said, however, that no other jurisdicti­ons with legal assisted death have experience­d violence or threats because of it, and the government has offered no proof that would occur in Ontario.

Nor should the government withhold informatio­n in order to “stifle legitimate and peaceful protest,” he wrote.

“The right to protest and express criticism of government decisions is an integral component of any democracy and is protected by ... the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees everyone freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and associatio­n.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada