Windsor Star

‘DANGEROUS GROUND’

- National Post, with files from Jacob Serebrin, Montreal Gazette and Douglas Quan, National Post bplatt@postmedia.com

Speaking from Montreal after the committee testimony, Trudeau said he “completely disagrees” with Wilson-Raybould’s characteri­zation of events, and said the decision on the SNC-Lavalin case was always “hers alone.” Yet he declined to respond to any of the specific allegation­s Wilson-Raybould made about comments from him and his senior staff. “I strongly maintain, as I have from the beginning, that I and my staff alway acted appropriat­ely and profession­ally,” he said. “Our government will always focus on jobs and our economy. We of course had discussion­s about the potential loss of 9,000 jobs in communitie­s across the country, including the possible impact on pensions.”

Asked whether Wilson-Raybould should remain in caucus, Trudeau said he had not reviewed her testimony in full yet, and would make decisions on that once he had. Conservati­ve leader Andrew Scheer, meanwhile, said Trudeau had lost the moral authority to govern and called on him to resign. “Justin Trudeau simply cannot continue to govern this country now that Canadians know what he has done,” Scheer said. “That is why I am calling on Mr. Trudeau to do the right thing and to resign. Further, the RCMP must immediatel­y open an investigat­ion, if it has not already done so, into the numerous examples of obstructio­n of justice the former attorney general detailed in her testimony.” He also called for Wernick’s resignatio­n. Asked if the RCMP was investigat­ing allegation­s of political interferen­ce in the matter — or planned to investigat­e — the force’s deputy commission­er Gilles Michaud said “it would be inappropri­ate to confirm or deny the existence of a criminal investigat­ion.” NDP leader Jagmeet Singh said Wednesday evening that while Trudeau may eventually need to step down, for now his party is calling for a public inquiry to bring out the facts. “What we need to do is get to the truth, and that’s what a public inquiry will do,” he said. “He may need to resign because of this, but … a public inquiry will get to the bottom, get to the heart of this.” Wilson-Raybould’s testimony included detailed accounts of conversati­ons, telephone calls, emails, and text messages with 11 senior government officials. Those named in her testimony included Trudeau, Telford and Butts, who resigned last week amid controvers­y over his role in the SNC-Lavalin scandal; Morneau and his chief of staff, Ben Chin; and Wernick, the ostensibly nonpartisa­n head of the federal public service whose testimony before the committee last week some observers criticized for being partisan in tone and content. After federal prosecutor­s decided on Sept. 4 against a remediatio­n agreement for SNC-Lavalin, it took only two days for Morneau’s chief of staff to contact Wilson-Raybould’s chief of staff, Jessica Prince. Wilson-Raybould said the first time PMO staff contacted her office was Sept. 16, in a phone call with Prince.

On Sept. 17, she had a meeting with Trudeau that she had previously requested on another subject. Wernick was unexpected­ly also in attendance. She said Trudeau raised the SNC-Lavalin case “immediatel­y.”

“The prime minister asks me to help out, to find a solution here for SNC, citing that if there was no (deferred prosecutio­n) there would be many jobs lost and that SNC will move from Montreal,” she said. She said she told him she had made up her mind, and was not going to interfere with the decision of federal prosecutor­s.

She said the discussion continued, with Wernick making the argument that the company could leave Canada if the prosecutio­n continued.

“At that point (Trudeau) jumped in, stressing that there is an election in Quebec and that ‘I am an MP in Quebec — the member for Papineau,” Wilson-Raybould said. “I was quite taken aback. My response, and I vividly remember this as well, was to ask (Trudeau) a direct question while looking him in the eye. I asked: ‘Are you politicall­y interferin­g with my role, my decision as the attorney general? I would strongly advise against it.’ The prime minister said ‘No, no, no – we just need to find a solution.’” There would be many more meetings and phone calls with Morneau, his staff and PMO staff. She met with Butts on Dec. 5, and she said she told him “how I needed everyone to stop talking to me about SNC as I had made up my mind and the engagement­s were inappropri­ate.” “Gerry then took over the conversati­on and said how we need a solution on the SNC stuff,” she said. She alleges he told her that the Director of Public Prosecutio­ns Act, which separated the prosecutio­n service from the justice department, “was a statute passed by (former Prime Minister Stephen) Harper,” and that he “does not like the law.”

The two final meetings came on Dec. 18 and Dec. 19. The first one had Butts and Telford meeting with Prince and pushing her to find a solution. Wilson-Raybould read out text messages that Prince sent her after the meeting, including the allegation that Butts had said: “Jess, there is no solution here that doesn’t involve some interferen­ce.” The next day, she had a phone call with Wernick. She told him she was starting to have thoughts of the “Saturday Night Massacre.”

On Jan. 7, Trudeau called Wilson-Raybould to inform her she would be removed as justice minister and attorney general.

“I will not go into details of this call, or subsequent communicat­ions about the shuffle, but I will say that I stated I believed the reason was because of the SNC matter,” she said. “They denied this to be the case.” Following her opening statement, Wilson-Raybould took six rounds of questions from Liberal, Conservati­ve and NDP MPs. The Liberals focused many of their questions on why she didn’t immediatel­y resign, and why she stayed in cabinet after she was shuffled to Veterans Affairs in January (she subsequent­ly resigned after the SNC-Lavalin story hit the media).

“I decided that I would take the prime minister at this word, I trusted him, I had confidence in him, and so I decided to continue on around the cabinet table with the concerns that I had around SNC,” she said. “Do you have confidence in the prime minister today?” asked Liberal MP Randy Boissonnau­lt. Wilson-Raybould paused for a long time before answering. “I’ll say this ... I resigned from cabinet because I did not have confidence to sit around the table, the cabinet table,” she said. “That’s why I resigned.” Later, she was asked again by Liberal MP Jennifer O’Connell if she had confidence in Trudeau. Said Wilson-Raybould, “I’m not sure how that question is relevant.”

I RESIGNED FROM CABINET BECAUSE I DID NOT HAVE CONFIDENCE TO SIT AROUND THE TABLE.

 ?? ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Jody Wilson-Raybould waits to testify to the House of Commons justice committee in Ottawa on Wednesday.
ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS Jody Wilson-Raybould waits to testify to the House of Commons justice committee in Ottawa on Wednesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada